ARKW vs QPX
ARK Next Generation Technology ETF vs Advisorshares Q Dynamic Growth ETF
Which is better, ARKW or QPX?
Each has led over a different period.
ARKW has a lower expense ratio. ARKW led over 3Y, QPX over 1Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ARKW | QPX |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.76%Best | 1.74% |
| AUM | $2.0B | $34M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.47% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 88 | 18 |
| YTD Return | +7.08%Best | +6.84% |
| 1Y Return | -5.81% | +10.49%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +44.31%Best | +19.47% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.38% | +10.62%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 39.8% | 17.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -80.0% | -34.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,248 | $16,564Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 44.6% | - |
| Fund Family | Ark Invest | Advisor Shares |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Sep 30, 2014 | Dec 28, 2020 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 29, 2020 to Oct 14, 2026 (5.8 years).
ARKW vs QPX growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.8 years both funds cover.
ARKW vs QPX Performance
ARK Next Generation Technology ETF (ARKW) is an ETF from Ark Invest and Advisorshares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) is an ETF from Advisor Shares. Over the past year ARKW returned -5.81% while QPX returned +10.49%. Year to date, ARKW is up 7.08% versus a gain of 6.84% for QPX.
Over three years, ARKW compounded at +44.31% per year against +19.47% for QPX; over five years the annualized figures are +2.38% and +10.62% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, QPX has the edge at +11.85% annualized vs +2.42%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ARKW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 39.8% compared with 17.1% for QPX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -80.0% for ARKW and -34.7% for QPX. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ARKW charges 0.76% per year while QPX charges 1.74%. On a $10,000 position that is $76 vs $174 annually, a gap of $98 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARKW currently yields 1.47% against 0.00% for QPX.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 40 holdings in ARKW and 7 in QPX, totalling 96.5% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in ARKW and 7 in QPX, against full books of 88 and 18.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 7 positions for QPX that do not appear in our book for ARKW (100.0% of the fund), and 36 for ARKW that do not appear in QPX (89.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ARKW and QPX you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ARKW or QPX?
ARKW has an expense ratio of 0.76% while QPX charges 1.74%. ARKW is the cheaper option, by $98 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ARKW or QPX?
Over the past year ARKW returned -5.81% vs +10.49% for QPX, so QPX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), ARKW annualized +2.42% vs +11.85% for QPX. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ARKW or QPX?
ARKW has been the more volatile fund at 39.8% annualized versus 17.1% for QPX. Worst drawdown: ARKW -80.0% vs QPX -34.7%.
Should I hold both ARKW and QPX?
ARKW and QPX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ARKW or QPX?
ARKW yields 1.47% while QPX yields 0.00%, so ARKW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QPX better than ARKW?
ARKW has a lower expense ratio. ARKW led over 3Y, QPX over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.