ARKW vs SSPX
ARK Next Generation Technology ETF vs Janus Henderson US Sustainable Equity ETF
Which is better, ARKW or SSPX?
SSPX has been ahead.
SSPX has a lower expense ratio. SSPX led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ARKW | SSPX |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.76% | 0.55%Best |
| AUM | $2.0B | $10M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.47% | 0.30% |
| Holdings | 88 | 6 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 43.9% | 18.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -76.8% | -34.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.1 years | $12,358 | $12,842Best |
| Fund Family | Ark Invest | Janus Henderson Investors |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Sep 30, 2014 | Sep 8, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 370 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. ARKW has data through Oct 14, 2026 and SSPX through Oct 9, 2025.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2021 to Oct 9, 2025 (4.1 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ARKW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 43.9% compared with 18.9% for SSPX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -76.8% for ARKW and -34.0% for SSPX. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ARKW charges 0.76% per year while SSPX charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $76 vs $55 annually, a gap of $21 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARKW currently yields 1.47% against 0.30% for SSPX.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ARKW and SSPX you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ARKW or SSPX?
ARKW has an expense ratio of 0.76% while SSPX charges 0.55%. SSPX is the cheaper option, by $21 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, ARKW or SSPX?
ARKW has been the more volatile fund at 43.9% annualized versus 18.9% for SSPX. Worst drawdown: ARKW -76.8% vs SSPX -34.0%.
Should I hold both ARKW and SSPX?
ARKW and SSPX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ARKW or SSPX?
ARKW yields 1.47% while SSPX yields 0.30%, so ARKW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SSPX better than ARKW?
SSPX has a lower expense ratio. SSPX led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.