ARKW vs SXQG
ARK Next Generation Technology ETF vs ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF
Which is better, ARKW or SXQG?
Each has led over a different period.
SXQG has a lower expense ratio. ARKW led over 3Y, SXQG over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. SXQG is less concentrated, with 43.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ARKW | SXQG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.76% | 0.70%Best |
| AUM | $2.0B | $63M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.47% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 88 | 235 |
| YTD Return | +7.08%Best | +3.37% |
| 1Y Return | -5.81% | +2.54%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +44.31%Best | +11.82% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.38% | +5.68%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 40.9% | 16.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -76.8% | -34.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,248 | $13,181Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 44.6% | 43.0%Best |
| Fund Family | Ark Invest | 6 Meridian ETF |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Sep 30, 2014 | May 10, 2021 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 11, 2021 to Oct 14, 2026 (5.4 years).
ARKW vs SXQG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.4 years both funds cover.
ARKW vs SXQG Performance
ARK Next Generation Technology ETF (ARKW) is an ETF from Ark Invest and ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF (SXQG) is an ETF from 6 Meridian ETF. Over the past year ARKW returned -5.81% while SXQG returned +2.54%. Year to date, ARKW is up 7.08% versus a gain of 3.37% for SXQG.
Over three years, ARKW compounded at +44.31% per year against +11.82% for SXQG; over five years the annualized figures are +2.38% and +5.68% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ARKW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 40.9% compared with 16.4% for SXQG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -76.8% for ARKW and -34.0% for SXQG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ARKW charges 0.76% per year while SXQG charges 0.70%. On a $10,000 position that is $76 vs $70 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARKW currently yields 1.47% against 0.00% for SXQG.
Holdings Overlap
14.8% of ARKW's money is in holdings SXQG also owns. 15.9% of SXQG's money is in holdings ARKW also owns.
SXQG and ARKW share little of their money.
7 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in ARKW and 84 in SXQG, against full books of 88 and 235.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 73 positions for SXQG that do not appear in our book for ARKW (81.7% of the fund), and 29 for ARKW that do not appear in SXQG (74.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ARKW | Weight in SXQG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 4.34% | 4.74% | 0.40% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 2.73% | 4.17% | 1.44% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc | 2.27% | 3.25% | 0.98% |
| DDOGDatadog Inc | 2.50% | 1.31% | 1.19% |
| SPOTSpotify Technology S.A. Ordinary Shares | 1.07% | 1.01% | 0.06% |
| ABNBAirbnb Inc | 0.79% | 1.21% | 0.42% |
| TOSTToast Inc | 1.10% | 0.24% | 0.86% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ARKW and SXQG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ARKW or SXQG?
ARKW has an expense ratio of 0.76% while SXQG charges 0.70%. SXQG is the cheaper option, by $6 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ARKW or SXQG?
Over the past year ARKW returned -5.81% vs +2.54% for SXQG, so SXQG leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ARKW or SXQG?
ARKW has been the more volatile fund at 40.9% annualized versus 16.4% for SXQG. Worst drawdown: ARKW -76.8% vs SXQG -34.0%.
Should I hold both ARKW and SXQG?
ARKW and SXQG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ARKW and SXQG?
15.9% of SXQG's money is in holdings ARKW also owns. 15.9% of SXQG's is in holdings ARKW also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in ARKW and 84 in SXQG.
Which pays a higher dividend, ARKW or SXQG?
ARKW yields 1.47% while SXQG yields 0.00%, so ARKW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SXQG better than ARKW?
SXQG has a lower expense ratio. ARKW led over 3Y, SXQG over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. SXQG is less concentrated, with 43.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.