ARKX vs IVV
ARK Space & Defense Innovation ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ARKX or IVV?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ARKX led over 3Y, IVV over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ARKX | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $760M | $882.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 31 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +4.73% | +14.84%Best |
| 1Y Return | +1.39% | +18.70%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +31.99%Best | +22.93% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.88% | +13.91%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 27.5% | 15.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -43.6% | -24.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,017 | $19,178Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 56.3% | 38.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Ark Invest | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 30, 2021 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 30, 2021 to Oct 13, 2026 (5.5 years).
ARKX vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.5 years both funds cover.
ARKX vs IVV Performance
ARK Space & Defense Innovation ETF (ARKX) is an ETF from Ark Invest and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ARKX returned +1.39% while IVV returned +18.70%. Year to date, ARKX is up 4.73% versus a gain of 14.84% for IVV.
Over three years, ARKX compounded at +31.99% per year against +22.93% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +9.88% and +13.91% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +14.61% annualized vs +8.22%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ARKX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.5% compared with 15.2% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -43.6% for ARKX and -24.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ARKX charges 0.75% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARKX currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
52.3% of ARKX's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 21.5% of IVV's money is in holdings ARKX also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
16 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in ARKX and 505 in IVV, against full books of 31 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 481 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for ARKX (77.8% of the fund), and 10 for ARKX that do not appear in IVV (36.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ARKX | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 4.98% | 8.00% | 3.02% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.06% | 3.80% | 1.26% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 6.63% | 1.27% | 5.36% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 4.29% | 2.40% | 1.89% |
| LHXL3Harris Technologies Inc. | 5.99% | 0.07% | 5.92% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 3.17% | 1.56% | 1.61% |
| TERTeradyne Inc - Common | 4.40% | 0.09% | 4.31% |
| DEDeere & Co Sedol 2261203 | 3.70% | 0.26% | 3.44% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 3.32% | 0.58% | 2.74% |
| TRMBTrimble Inc. | 3.42% | 0.02% | 3.40% |
52.3% of ARKX is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ARKX or IVV?
ARKX has an expense ratio of 0.75% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ARKX or IVV?
Over the past year ARKX returned +1.39% vs +18.70% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), ARKX annualized +8.22% vs +14.61% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ARKX or IVV?
ARKX has been the more volatile fund at 27.5% annualized versus 15.2% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ARKX -43.6% vs IVV -24.5%.
Should I hold both ARKX and IVV?
ARKX and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ARKX and IVV?
52.3% of ARKX's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 21.5% of IVV's is in holdings ARKX also owns. They hold 16 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in ARKX and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, ARKX or IVV?
ARKX yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than ARKX?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ARKX led over 3Y, IVV over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.