ASCE vs VTI
Allspring SMID Core ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, ASCE or VTI?
Small Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. ASCE led over 1Y and the full window. ASCE is less concentrated, with 25.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ASCE | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.38% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $253M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.18% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 52 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +18.95%Best | +13.02% |
| 1Y Return | +25.26%Best | +16.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.99% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.6% | 11.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -9.2% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $13,178Best | $12,580 |
| Top 10 Weight | 25.2%Best | 33.5% |
| Fund Family | Allspring Global Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 8, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 8, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.3 years).
ASCE vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
ASCE vs VTI Performance
Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE) is an ETF from Allspring Global Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ASCE returned +25.26% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, ASCE is up 18.95% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ASCE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.6% compared with 11.8% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.2% for ASCE and -8.9% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ASCE charges 0.38% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $3 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ASCE currently yields 0.18% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
91.4% of ASCE's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.4% of VTI's money is in holdings ASCE also owns.
Most of ASCE is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
48 positions in common, counted across the 52 positions we hold weights for in ASCE and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 52 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,126 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for ASCE (97.2% of the fund), and 2 for ASCE that do not appear in VTI (3.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ASCE | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMRXAmneal Pharmaceuticals Inc. | 3.04% | 0.00% | 3.04% |
| EXELExelixis Inc | 2.78% | 0.02% | 2.76% |
| SMTCSemtech Corp | 2.68% | 0.02% | 2.66% |
| UHSUniversal Health Services Inc. | 2.48% | 0.01% | 2.47% |
| EXLSExlservice Holdings, Inc. (A) | 2.37% | 0.01% | 2.36% |
| OASChord Energy Corp | 2.34% | 0.01% | 2.33% |
| VIRTVirtu Financial Inc Class A | 2.30% | 0.01% | 2.29% |
| SKYWSkywest Inc | 2.25% | 0.01% | 2.24% |
| CDECoeur Mining Inc | 2.21% | 0.03% | 2.18% |
| TTMITtm Techologies | 2.20% | 0.02% | 2.18% |
91.4% of ASCE is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ASCE or VTI?
ASCE has an expense ratio of 0.38% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $35 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ASCE or VTI?
Over the past year ASCE returned +25.26% vs +16.63% for VTI, so ASCE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), ASCE annualized +23.65% vs +19.31% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ASCE or VTI?
ASCE has been the more volatile fund at 15.6% annualized versus 11.8% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ASCE -9.2% vs VTI -8.9%.
Should I hold both ASCE and VTI?
ASCE and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ASCE and VTI?
91.4% of ASCE's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.4% of VTI's is in holdings ASCE also owns. They hold 48 positions in common, counted across the 52 positions we hold weights for in ASCE and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, ASCE or VTI?
ASCE yields 0.18% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than ASCE?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. ASCE led over 1Y and the full window. ASCE is less concentrated, with 25.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.