ATFV vs BAI
Alger 35 ETF vs iShares AI Innovation and Tech Active ETF
Which is better, ATFV or BAI?
BAI has been ahead.
BAI led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ATFV | BAI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55%Tie | 0.55%Tie |
| AUM | $629M | $14.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.17% | 1.26% |
| Holdings | 36 | 55 |
| YTD Return | +10.86% | +30.13%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.47% | +30.79%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +37.88% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.24% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.0%Best | 37.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -29.0%Best | -34.1% |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $16,866 | $18,007Best |
| Fund Family | Alger | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 4, 2021 | Oct 21, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 22, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2 years).
ATFV vs BAI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
ATFV vs BAI Performance
Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) is an ETF from Alger and iShares AI Innovation and Tech Active ETF (BAI) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ATFV returned +11.47% while BAI returned +30.79%. Year to date, ATFV is up 10.86% versus a gain of 30.13% for BAI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BAI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 37.4% compared with 26.0% for ATFV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.0% for ATFV and -34.1% for BAI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ATFV charges 0.55% per year while BAI charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $55 annually. On income, ATFV currently yields 0.17% against 1.26% for BAI.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ATFV and BAI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ATFV or BAI?
ATFV has an expense ratio of 0.55% while BAI charges 0.55%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, ATFV or BAI?
Over the past year ATFV returned +11.47% vs +30.79% for BAI, so BAI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ATFV annualized +29.87% vs +34.19% for BAI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ATFV or BAI?
BAI has been the more volatile fund at 37.4% annualized versus 26.0% for ATFV. Worst drawdown: ATFV -29.0% vs BAI -34.1%.
Should I hold both ATFV and BAI?
ATFV and BAI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ATFV or BAI?
ATFV yields 0.17% while BAI yields 1.26%, so BAI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is BAI better than ATFV?
BAI led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.