ATFV vs BALI
Alger 35 ETF vs iShares US Large Cap Premium Income Active ETF
Which is better, ATFV or BALI?
Each has led over a different period.
BALI has a lower expense ratio. ATFV led over 3Y and the full window, BALI over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ATFV | BALI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.35%Best |
| AUM | $629M | $1.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.17% | 7.81% |
| Holdings | 36 | 206 |
| YTD Return | +10.86% | +11.92%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.47% | +15.74%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +37.88%Best | +19.08% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.24% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.6% | 10.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -29.0% | -16.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 3 years | $26,677Best | $17,073 |
| Fund Family | Alger | BlackRock, Inc. (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 4, 2021 | Sep 26, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 28, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3 years).
ATFV vs BALI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3 years both funds cover.
ATFV vs BALI Performance
Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) is an ETF from Alger and iShares US Large Cap Premium Income Active ETF (BALI) is an ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US). Over the past year ATFV returned +11.47% while BALI returned +15.74%. Year to date, ATFV is up 10.86% versus a gain of 11.92% for BALI.
Over three years, ATFV compounded at +37.88% per year against +19.08% for BALI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ATFV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.6% compared with 10.2% for BALI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.0% for ATFV and -16.6% for BALI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ATFV charges 0.55% per year while BALI charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $35 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ATFV currently yields 0.17% against 7.81% for BALI.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ATFV and BALI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ATFV or BALI?
ATFV has an expense ratio of 0.55% while BALI charges 0.35%. BALI is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ATFV or BALI?
Over the past year ATFV returned +11.47% vs +15.74% for BALI, so BALI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ATFV or BALI?
ATFV has been the more volatile fund at 23.6% annualized versus 10.2% for BALI. Worst drawdown: ATFV -29.0% vs BALI -16.6%.
Should I hold both ATFV and BALI?
ATFV and BALI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ATFV or BALI?
ATFV yields 0.17% while BALI yields 7.81%, so BALI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is BALI better than ATFV?
BALI has a lower expense ratio. ATFV led over 3Y and the full window, BALI over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.