ATFV vs GK
Alger 35 ETF vs AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF
Which is better, ATFV or GK?
ATFV has been ahead.
ATFV has a lower expense ratio. ATFV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ATFV | GK |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55%Best | 0.77% |
| AUM | $629M | $32M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.17% | 0.07% |
| Holdings | 36 | 60 |
| YTD Return | +10.86%Best | +10.81% |
| 1Y Return | +11.47%Best | +8.34% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +37.88%Best | +19.66% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.24%Best | +2.56% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.1% | 23.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -45.3%Best | -47.7% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,813Best | $11,347 |
| Fund Family | Alger | Advisor Shares |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 4, 2021 | Jul 1, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 2, 2021 to Oct 14, 2026 (5.3 years).
ATFV vs GK growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.3 years both funds cover.
ATFV vs GK Performance
Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) is an ETF from Alger and AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) is an ETF from Advisor Shares. Over the past year ATFV returned +11.47% while GK returned +8.34%. Year to date, ATFV is up 10.86% versus a gain of 10.81% for GK.
Over three years, ATFV compounded at +37.88% per year against +19.66% for GK; over five years the annualized figures are +12.24% and +2.56% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ATFV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.1% compared with 23.0% for GK. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -45.3% for ATFV and -47.7% for GK. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ATFV charges 0.55% per year while GK charges 0.77%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $77 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ATFV currently yields 0.17% against 0.07% for GK.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ATFV and GK you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ATFV or GK?
ATFV has an expense ratio of 0.55% while GK charges 0.77%. ATFV is the cheaper option, by $22 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ATFV or GK?
Over the past year ATFV returned +11.47% vs +8.34% for GK, so ATFV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ATFV or GK?
ATFV has been the more volatile fund at 24.1% annualized versus 23.0% for GK. Worst drawdown: ATFV -45.3% vs GK -47.7%.
Should I hold both ATFV and GK?
ATFV and GK have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ATFV or GK?
ATFV yields 0.17% while GK yields 0.07%, so ATFV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is GK better than ATFV?
ATFV has a lower expense ratio. ATFV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.