ATFV vs IGGY
Alger 35 ETF vs AB International Growth ETF
Which is better, ATFV or IGGY?
ATFV has been ahead.
ATFV led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ATFV | IGGY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55%Tie | 0.55%Tie |
| AUM | $629M | $4M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.17% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 36 | 67 |
| YTD Return | +10.86%Best | -5.44% |
| 1Y Return | +11.47%Best | -6.77% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +37.88% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.24% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.9% | 18.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.3%Best | -19.7% |
| $10,000 over 1.1 years | $11,270Best | $9,248 |
| Fund Family | Alger | AllianceBernstein L.P. |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 4, 2021 | Sep 17, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 17, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.1 years).
ATFV vs IGGY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.1 years both funds cover.
ATFV vs IGGY Performance
Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) is an ETF from Alger and AB International Growth ETF (IGGY) is an ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P.. Over the past year ATFV returned +11.47% while IGGY returned -6.77%. Year to date, ATFV is up 10.86% versus a loss of 5.44% for IGGY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ATFV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.9% compared with 18.3% for IGGY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.3% for ATFV and -19.7% for IGGY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ATFV charges 0.55% per year while IGGY charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $55 annually. On income, ATFV currently yields 0.17% against 0.00% for IGGY.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ATFV and IGGY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ATFV or IGGY?
ATFV has an expense ratio of 0.55% while IGGY charges 0.55%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, ATFV or IGGY?
Over the past year ATFV returned +11.47% vs -6.77% for IGGY, so ATFV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), ATFV annualized +11.48% vs -6.86% for IGGY. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ATFV or IGGY?
ATFV has been the more volatile fund at 22.9% annualized versus 18.3% for IGGY. Worst drawdown: ATFV -18.3% vs IGGY -19.7%.
Should I hold both ATFV and IGGY?
ATFV and IGGY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ATFV or IGGY?
ATFV yields 0.17% while IGGY yields 0.00%, so ATFV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IGGY better than ATFV?
ATFV led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.