ATFV vs KOOL
Alger 35 ETF vs North Shore Equity Rotation ETF
Which is better, ATFV or KOOL?
Each has led over a different period.
ATFV has a lower expense ratio. ATFV led over the full window, KOOL over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ATFV | KOOL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55%Best | 0.93% |
| AUM | $629M | $60M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.17% | 0.43% |
| Holdings | 36 | 42 |
| YTD Return | +10.86% | +15.54%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.47% | +16.89%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +37.88% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.24% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.1% | 12.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -29.0% | -20.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.5 years | $19,299Best | $14,826 |
| Fund Family | Alger | North Shore Indices |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 4, 2021 | Apr 1, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 2, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.5 years).
ATFV vs KOOL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.5 years both funds cover.
ATFV vs KOOL Performance
Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) is an ETF from Alger and North Shore Equity Rotation ETF (KOOL) is an ETF from North Shore Indices. Over the past year ATFV returned +11.47% while KOOL returned +16.89%. Year to date, ATFV is up 10.86% versus a gain of 15.54% for KOOL.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ATFV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.1% compared with 12.0% for KOOL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.0% for ATFV and -20.6% for KOOL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ATFV charges 0.55% per year while KOOL charges 0.93%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $93 annually, a gap of $38 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ATFV currently yields 0.17% against 0.43% for KOOL.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ATFV and KOOL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ATFV or KOOL?
ATFV has an expense ratio of 0.55% while KOOL charges 0.93%. ATFV is the cheaper option, by $38 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ATFV or KOOL?
Over the past year ATFV returned +11.47% vs +16.89% for KOOL, so KOOL leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ATFV or KOOL?
ATFV has been the more volatile fund at 24.1% annualized versus 12.0% for KOOL. Worst drawdown: ATFV -29.0% vs KOOL -20.6%.
Should I hold both ATFV and KOOL?
ATFV and KOOL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ATFV or KOOL?
ATFV yields 0.17% while KOOL yields 0.43%, so KOOL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is KOOL better than ATFV?
ATFV has a lower expense ratio. ATFV led over the full window, KOOL over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.