ATFV vs PCLG
Alger 35 ETF vs Polen Focus Growth ETF
Which is better, ATFV or PCLG?
ATFV has been ahead.
PCLG has a lower expense ratio. ATFV led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ATFV | PCLG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.49%Best |
| AUM | $629M | $92M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.17% | 0.04% |
| Holdings | 36 | 27 |
| YTD Return | +10.86%Best | -5.60% |
| 1Y Return | +11.47%Best | -8.10% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +37.88% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.24% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.9% | 17.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.3%Best | -23.8% |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $10,935Best | $9,249 |
| Fund Family | Alger | Polen Capital |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 4, 2021 | Sep 30, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 30, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1 years).
ATFV vs PCLG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.
ATFV vs PCLG Performance
Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) is an ETF from Alger and Polen Focus Growth ETF (PCLG) is an ETF from Polen Capital. Over the past year ATFV returned +11.47% while PCLG returned -8.10%. Year to date, ATFV is up 10.86% versus a loss of 5.60% for PCLG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ATFV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.9% compared with 17.7% for PCLG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.3% for ATFV and -23.8% for PCLG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ATFV charges 0.55% per year while PCLG charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $49 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ATFV currently yields 0.17% against 0.04% for PCLG.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ATFV and PCLG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ATFV or PCLG?
ATFV has an expense ratio of 0.55% while PCLG charges 0.49%. PCLG is the cheaper option, by $6 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ATFV or PCLG?
Over the past year ATFV returned +11.47% vs -8.10% for PCLG, so ATFV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), ATFV annualized +9.35% vs -7.51% for PCLG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ATFV or PCLG?
ATFV has been the more volatile fund at 22.9% annualized versus 17.7% for PCLG. Worst drawdown: ATFV -18.3% vs PCLG -23.8%.
Should I hold both ATFV and PCLG?
ATFV and PCLG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ATFV or PCLG?
ATFV yields 0.17% while PCLG yields 0.04%, so ATFV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PCLG better than ATFV?
PCLG has a lower expense ratio. ATFV led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.