ATFV vs QRFT
Alger 35 ETF vs Qraft AI-Enhanced US Large Cap ETF
Which is better, ATFV or QRFT?
Each has led over a different period.
ATFV has a lower expense ratio. ATFV led over the full window, QRFT over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ATFV | QRFT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $629M | $9M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.17% | 0.25% |
| Holdings | 36 | 301 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.3% | 16.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -45.3% | -28.2%Best |
| $10,000 over 5.2 years | $19,865Best | $18,145 |
| Fund Family | Alger | QRAFT AI ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 4, 2021 | May 20, 2019 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 85 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. ATFV has data through Oct 14, 2026 and QRFT through Jul 21, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 5.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 4, 2021 to Jul 21, 2026 (5.2 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ATFV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.3% compared with 16.5% for QRFT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -45.3% for ATFV and -28.2% for QRFT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ATFV charges 0.55% per year while QRFT charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $75 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ATFV currently yields 0.17% against 0.25% for QRFT.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ATFV and QRFT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ATFV or QRFT?
ATFV has an expense ratio of 0.55% while QRFT charges 0.75%. ATFV is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, ATFV or QRFT?
ATFV has been the more volatile fund at 24.3% annualized versus 16.5% for QRFT. Worst drawdown: ATFV -45.3% vs QRFT -28.2%.
Should I hold both ATFV and QRFT?
ATFV and QRFT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ATFV or QRFT?
ATFV yields 0.17% while QRFT yields 0.25%, so QRFT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QRFT better than ATFV?
ATFV has a lower expense ratio. ATFV led over the full window, QRFT over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.