ATFV vs SPYT
Alger 35 ETF vs Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF
Which is better, ATFV or SPYT?
Each has led over a different period.
ATFV has a lower expense ratio. ATFV led over the full window, SPYT over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ATFV | SPYT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55%Best | 0.92% |
| AUM | $629M | $170M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.17% | 20.83% |
| Holdings | 36 | 10 |
| YTD Return | +10.86% | +12.99%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.47% | +15.90%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +37.88% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.24% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.2% | 10.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -29.0% | -18.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.6 years | $19,143Best | $14,369 |
| Fund Family | Alger | Defiance ETFs, LLC |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 4, 2021 | Mar 7, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 7, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.6 years).
ATFV vs SPYT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.6 years both funds cover.
ATFV vs SPYT Performance
Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) is an ETF from Alger and Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF (SPYT) is an ETF from Defiance ETFs, LLC. Over the past year ATFV returned +11.47% while SPYT returned +15.90%. Year to date, ATFV is up 10.86% versus a gain of 12.99% for SPYT.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ATFV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.2% compared with 10.7% for SPYT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.0% for ATFV and -18.3% for SPYT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ATFV charges 0.55% per year while SPYT charges 0.92%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $92 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ATFV currently yields 0.17% against 20.83% for SPYT.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ATFV and SPYT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ATFV or SPYT?
ATFV has an expense ratio of 0.55% while SPYT charges 0.92%. ATFV is the cheaper option, by $37 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ATFV or SPYT?
Over the past year ATFV returned +11.47% vs +15.90% for SPYT, so SPYT leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ATFV or SPYT?
ATFV has been the more volatile fund at 24.2% annualized versus 10.7% for SPYT. Worst drawdown: ATFV -29.0% vs SPYT -18.3%.
Should I hold both ATFV and SPYT?
ATFV and SPYT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ATFV or SPYT?
ATFV yields 0.17% while SPYT yields 20.83%, so SPYT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SPYT better than ATFV?
ATFV has a lower expense ratio. ATFV led over the full window, SPYT over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.