ATFV vs THRO

ATFV vs THRO

Which is better, ATFV or THRO?

Each has led over a different period.

ATFV has a lower expense ratio. ATFV led over 3Y and the full window, THRO over 1Y.

Lower Fees: ATFVHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricATFVTHRO
Expense Ratio0.55%Best0.57%
AUM$629M$7.5B
Dividend Yield0.17%0.30%
Holdings36251
YTD Return+10.86%+14.55%Best
1Y Return+11.47%+18.23%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+37.88%Best+23.72%
5Y Return (annualized)+12.24%-
Volatility (annualized)24.4%17.4%Best
Max Drawdown-38.3%-26.5%Best
$10,000 over 4.8 years$19,855Best$18,140
Fund FamilyAlgerBlackRock, Inc. (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionMay 4, 2021Dec 14, 2021

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 16, 2021 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.8 years).

ATFV vs THRO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.8 years both funds cover.

Compare ATFV against instead:ATFV vs SPYATFV vs QQQATFV vs VOOATFV vs VTITHRO against:THRO vs VXUS

ATFV vs THRO Performance

Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) is an ETF from Alger and iShares US Thematic Rotation Active ETF (THRO) is an ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US). Over the past year ATFV returned +11.47% while THRO returned +18.23%. Year to date, ATFV is up 10.86% versus a gain of 14.55% for THRO.

Over three years, ATFV compounded at +37.88% per year against +23.72% for THRO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

ATFV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.4% compared with 17.4% for THRO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -38.3% for ATFV and -26.5% for THRO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ATFV charges 0.55% per year while THRO charges 0.57%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $57 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ATFV currently yields 0.17% against 0.30% for THRO.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of ATFV and THRO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

ATFVTHRO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ATFV or THRO?

ATFV has an expense ratio of 0.55% while THRO charges 0.57%. ATFV is the cheaper option, by $2 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, ATFV or THRO?

Over the past year ATFV returned +11.47% vs +18.23% for THRO, so THRO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, ATFV or THRO?

ATFV has been the more volatile fund at 24.4% annualized versus 17.4% for THRO. Worst drawdown: ATFV -38.3% vs THRO -26.5%.

Should I hold both ATFV and THRO?

ATFV and THRO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, ATFV or THRO?

ATFV yields 0.17% while THRO yields 0.30%, so THRO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is THRO better than ATFV?

ATFV has a lower expense ratio. ATFV led over 3Y and the full window, THRO over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.