AUSF vs IVV
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, AUSF or IVV?
Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. AUSF is less concentrated, with 17.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AUSF | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.27% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $867M | $896.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.83% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 382 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +8.67% | +13.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.44% | +17.54%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.09% | +22.46%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.11% | +13.28%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.3% | 16.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -44.3% | -33.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,514 | $18,654Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 17.3%Best | 38.9% |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 24, 2018 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 28, 2018 to Oct 14, 2026 (8.1 years).
AUSF vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.1 years both funds cover.
AUSF vs IVV Performance
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF (AUSF) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year AUSF returned +11.44% while IVV returned +17.54%. Year to date, AUSF is up 8.67% versus a gain of 13.59% for IVV.
Over three years, AUSF compounded at +19.09% per year against +22.46% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +13.11% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +13.84% annualized vs +10.71%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AUSF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 16.7% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.3% for AUSF and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AUSF charges 0.27% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $27 vs $3 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AUSF currently yields 2.83% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
66.7% of AUSF's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 33.5% of IVV's money is in holdings AUSF also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
120 positions in common, counted across the 189 positions we hold weights for in AUSF and 506 in IVV, against full books of 382 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 379 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for AUSF (66.0% of the fund), and 63 for AUSF that do not appear in IVV (29.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AUSF | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 1.61% | 7.29% | 5.68% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 1.93% | 5.76% | 3.83% |
| GOOGLAlphabet, Inc. - Class a | 0.09% | 3.00% | 2.91% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc-Cl B | 1.61% | 1.41% | 0.20% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson | 1.57% | 0.94% | 0.63% |
| GOOGAlphabate, Inc Class C | 0.09% | 2.41% | 2.32% |
| VZVerizon Communications | 2.17% | 0.29% | 1.88% |
| TAt&t Inc Cdi Common Stock Usd1.0 | 2.07% | 0.25% | 1.82% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.57% | 0.65% | 0.92% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 1.28% | 0.70% | 0.58% |
66.7% of AUSF is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AUSF or IVV?
AUSF has an expense ratio of 0.27% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $24 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AUSF or IVV?
Over the past year AUSF returned +11.44% vs +17.54% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), AUSF annualized +10.71% vs +13.84% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AUSF or IVV?
AUSF has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 16.7% for IVV. Worst drawdown: AUSF -44.3% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both AUSF and IVV?
AUSF and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AUSF and IVV?
66.7% of AUSF's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 33.5% of IVV's is in holdings AUSF also owns. They hold 120 positions in common, counted across the 189 positions we hold weights for in AUSF and 506 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, AUSF or IVV?
AUSF yields 2.83% while IVV yields 1.10%, so AUSF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than AUSF?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. AUSF is less concentrated, with 17.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.