AVL vs MUU

AVL vs MUU

Which is better, AVL or MUU?

MUU has been ahead.

AVL has a lower expense ratio. MUU led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: AVLHigher Returns: MUU

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAVLMUU
Expense Ratio1.00%Best1.01%
AUM$283M$3.4B
Dividend Yield36.36%1.47%
Holdings1026
YTD Return-21.17%+340.14%Best
1Y Return-24.87%+1008.79%Best
Volatility (annualized)109.5%Best216.1%
Max Drawdown-70.6%Best-75.1%
$10,000 over 2 years$17,130$208,538Best
Fund FamilyDirexion Shares ETF TrustDirexion Shares ETF Trust
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleTrading-Leveraged EquityTrading-Leveraged Equity
InceptionOct 10, 2024Oct 10, 2024

Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 10, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2 years).

AVL vs MUU growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare AVL against instead:AVL vs SPYAVL vs QQQAVL vs VOOAVL vs VTIMUU against:MUU vs VXUS

AVL vs MUU Performance

Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X ETF (AVL) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X ETF (MUU) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust. Over the past year AVL returned -24.87% while MUU returned +1008.79%. Year to date, AVL is down 21.17% versus a gain of 340.14% for MUU.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

MUU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 216.1% compared with 109.5% for AVL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -70.6% for AVL and -75.1% for MUU. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.21. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AVL charges 1.00% per year while MUU charges 1.01%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $101 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AVL currently yields 36.36% against 1.47% for MUU.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 4 holdings in AVL and 4 in MUU, totalling 111.1% and 83.2% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 3 positions appear in both.

3 positions in common, counted across the 4 positions we hold weights for in AVL and 4 in MUU, against full books of 10 and 26.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in AVLWeight in MUUDifference
DGCXXDreyfus Govt Cash Man Ins25.58%38.39%12.81%
FGTXXGoldman Finl Sq Trsry Inst 50638.30%14.42%23.88%
DIRXXDreyfus Trsry Securities Cash Mgmt28.27%19.24%9.03%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of AVL and MUU you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

AVLMUU

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AVL or MUU?

AVL has an expense ratio of 1.00% while MUU charges 1.01%. AVL is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, AVL or MUU?

Over the past year AVL returned -24.87% vs +1008.79% for MUU, so MUU leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), AVL annualized +30.88% vs +356.66% for MUU. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, AVL or MUU?

MUU has been the more volatile fund at 216.1% annualized versus 109.5% for AVL. Worst drawdown: AVL -70.6% vs MUU -75.1%.

Should I hold both AVL and MUU?

AVL and MUU have a monthly-return correlation of 0.21, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, AVL or MUU?

AVL yields 36.36% while MUU yields 1.47%, so AVL currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is MUU better than AVL?

AVL has a lower expense ratio. MUU led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.