AVLV vs FBCV
Avantis US Large Cap Value ETF vs Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF
Which is better, AVLV or FBCV?
AVLV has been ahead.
AVLV has a lower expense ratio. AVLV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. AVLV is less concentrated, with 27.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AVLV | FBCV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15%Best | 0.57% |
| AUM | $22.1B | $184M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.14% | 1.25% |
| Holdings | 601 | 127 |
| YTD Return | +21.50%Best | +18.42% |
| 1Y Return | +30.84%Best | +24.20% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.16%Best | +16.61% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.42%Best | +10.11% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.5% | 13.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -19.5% | -15.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $19,611Best | $16,186 |
| Top 10 Weight | 27.2%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | Avantis Investors | Fidelity Investments (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 21, 2021 | Jun 2, 2020 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 23, 2021 to Oct 14, 2026 (5.1 years).
AVLV vs FBCV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.1 years both funds cover.
AVLV vs FBCV Performance
Avantis US Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) is an ETF from Avantis Investors and Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF (FBCV) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US). Over the past year AVLV returned +30.84% while FBCV returned +24.20%. Year to date, AVLV is up 21.50% versus a gain of 18.42% for FBCV.
Over three years, AVLV compounded at +22.16% per year against +16.61% for FBCV; over five years the annualized figures are +14.42% and +10.11% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AVLV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.5% compared with 13.2% for FBCV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.5% for AVLV and -15.6% for FBCV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AVLV charges 0.15% per year while FBCV charges 0.57%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $57 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AVLV currently yields 1.14% against 1.25% for FBCV.
Holdings Overlap
34.7% of AVLV's money is in holdings FBCV also owns. 46.3% of FBCV's money is in holdings AVLV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 63 days apart, AVLV as of Oct 2, 2026 and FBCV as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
45 positions in common, counted across the 304 positions we hold weights for in AVLV and 133 in FBCV, against full books of 601 and 127.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 69 positions for FBCV that do not appear in our book for AVLV (44.3% of the fund), and 233 for AVLV that do not appear in FBCV (64.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AVLV | Weight in FBCV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.93% | 7.46% | 4.53% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.45% | 5.24% | 1.79% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 2.75% | 4.64% | 1.89% |
| XOMExxonmobil Corp. | 2.42% | 3.37% | 0.95% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.48% | 1.04% | 2.44% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 3.45% | 0.01% | 3.44% |
| TRVThe Travelers Cos, Inc. | 1.01% | 2.10% | 1.09% |
| COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.01 | 1.13% | 1.79% | 0.66% |
| WFCWells Fargo & Co. | 1.32% | 1.31% | 0.01% |
| CBChubb Ltd Common Stock Usd 24.15 | 0.78% | 1.64% | 0.86% |
46.3% of FBCV is already inside AVLV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AVLV or FBCV?
AVLV has an expense ratio of 0.15% while FBCV charges 0.57%. AVLV is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AVLV or FBCV?
Over the past year AVLV returned +30.84% vs +24.20% for FBCV, so AVLV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AVLV or FBCV?
AVLV has been the more volatile fund at 16.5% annualized versus 13.2% for FBCV. Worst drawdown: AVLV -19.5% vs FBCV -15.6%.
Should I hold both AVLV and FBCV?
AVLV and FBCV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AVLV and FBCV?
46.3% of FBCV's money is in holdings AVLV also owns. 46.3% of FBCV's is in holdings AVLV also owns. They hold 45 positions in common, counted across the 304 positions we hold weights for in AVLV and 133 in FBCV.
Which pays a higher dividend, AVLV or FBCV?
AVLV yields 1.14% while FBCV yields 1.25%, so FBCV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FBCV better than AVLV?
AVLV has a lower expense ratio. AVLV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. AVLV is less concentrated, with 27.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.