AVLV vs MAVF
Avantis US Large Cap Value ETF vs Matrix Advisors Value ETF
Which is better, AVLV or MAVF?
AVLV has been ahead.
AVLV has a lower expense ratio. AVLV led over 1Y and the full window. AVLV is less concentrated, with 27.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AVLV | MAVF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $22.1B | $93M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.14% | 0.37% |
| Holdings | 601 | 29 |
| YTD Return | +21.50%Best | +13.01% |
| 1Y Return | +30.84%Best | +19.46% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.16% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.42% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.8%Best | 14.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -17.0% | -16.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.6 years | $13,753Best | $13,491 |
| Top 10 Weight | 27.2%Best | 54.6% |
| Fund Family | Avantis Investors | Matrix Asset Advisors |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 21, 2021 | Sep 16, 1983 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 24, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.6 years).
AVLV vs MAVF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.6 years both funds cover.
AVLV vs MAVF Performance
Avantis US Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) is an ETF from Avantis Investors and Matrix Advisors Value ETF (MAVF) is an ETF from Matrix Asset Advisors. Over the past year AVLV returned +30.84% while MAVF returned +19.46%. Year to date, AVLV is up 21.50% versus a gain of 13.01% for MAVF.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MAVF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.3% compared with 11.8% for AVLV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.0% for AVLV and -16.4% for MAVF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AVLV charges 0.15% per year while MAVF charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $75 annually, a gap of $60 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AVLV currently yields 1.14% against 0.37% for MAVF.
Holdings Overlap
20.8% of AVLV's money is in holdings MAVF also owns. 51.7% of MAVF's money is in holdings AVLV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
12 positions in common, counted across the 304 positions we hold weights for in AVLV and 27 in MAVF, against full books of 601 and 29.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 304 and 27 positions we hold weights for.
AVLV holds 266 positions MAVF does not, 78.0% of the fund.
Largest: MU 3.45%, XOM 2.42%, COST 2.32%, LLY 2.20%, VZ 1.60%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AVLV | Weight in MAVF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.45% | 8.61% | 5.16% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 2.75% | 7.06% | 4.31% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.93% | 6.38% | 3.45% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.48% | 5.73% | 2.25% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 2.61% | 3.19% | 0.58% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 0.88% | 3.98% | 3.10% |
| WFCWells Fargo & Co. | 1.32% | 3.34% | 2.02% |
| MSMorgan Stanley | 1.43% | 2.73% | 1.30% |
| GSGoldman Sachs Group Inc/The | 0.95% | 2.47% | 1.52% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 0.00% | 3.27% | 3.27% |
51.7% of MAVF is already inside AVLV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AVLV or MAVF?
AVLV has an expense ratio of 0.15% while MAVF charges 0.75%. AVLV is the cheaper option, by $60 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AVLV or MAVF?
Over the past year AVLV returned +30.84% vs +19.46% for MAVF, so AVLV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), AVLV annualized +22.04% vs +20.58% for MAVF. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AVLV or MAVF?
MAVF has been the more volatile fund at 14.3% annualized versus 11.8% for AVLV. Worst drawdown: AVLV -17.0% vs MAVF -16.4%.
Should I hold both AVLV and MAVF?
AVLV and MAVF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AVLV and MAVF?
51.7% of MAVF's money is in holdings AVLV also owns. 51.7% of MAVF's is in holdings AVLV also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 304 positions we hold weights for in AVLV and 27 in MAVF.
Which pays a higher dividend, AVLV or MAVF?
AVLV yields 1.14% while MAVF yields 0.37%, so AVLV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MAVF better than AVLV?
AVLV has a lower expense ratio. AVLV led over 1Y and the full window. AVLV is less concentrated, with 27.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.