AVOS vs QQQ

AVOS vs QQQ

Which is better, AVOS or QQQ?

Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.1%.

Lower Fees: QQQLess Concentrated: QQQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAVOSQQQ
Expense Ratio0.64%0.18%Best
AUM$116M$506.1B
Dividend Yield0.00%0.42%
Holdings239321
YTD Return+8.63%+19.30%Best
1Y Return-+22.47%
3Y Return (annualized)-+26.18%
5Y Return (annualized)-+15.42%
Top 10 Weight48.1%46.7%Best
Fund FamilyAvos Capital Management, LLCInvesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Growth
InceptionMar 5, 2026Mar 10, 1999

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

AVOS vs QQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

AVOS vs QQQ Performance

Avos Global Equities ETF (AVOS) is an ETF from Avos Capital Management, LLC and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, AVOS is up 8.63% versus a gain of 19.30% for QQQ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AVOS charges 0.64% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $64 vs $18 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AVOS currently yields 0.00% against 0.42% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

AVOS already in QQQ12.1%
QQQ already in AVOS32.0%

12.1% of AVOS's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 32.0% of QQQ's money is in holdings AVOS also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

22 positions in common, counted across the 238 positions we hold weights for in AVOS and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 239 and 321.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 70 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for AVOS (64.3% of the fund), and 104 for AVOS that do not appear in QQQ (71.2%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in AVOSWeight in QQQDifference
AAPLApple, Inc1.94%7.35%5.41%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 371.74%5.76%4.02%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc1.44%4.07%2.63%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc-cl A2.03%3.05%1.02%
WMTWalmart, Inc.0.82%2.11%1.29%
LRCXLam Research Corp0.35%1.72%1.37%
NFLXNetflix, Inc.0.28%1.21%0.93%
KLACKla Corp.0.30%1.06%0.76%
AMGNAmgen Inc.0.35%0.95%0.60%
QCOMQualcomm Inc.0.27%0.81%0.54%

32.0% of QQQ is already inside AVOS.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

AVOSQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AVOS or QQQ?

AVOS has an expense ratio of 0.64% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between AVOS and QQQ?

32.0% of QQQ's money is in holdings AVOS also owns. 32.0% of QQQ's is in holdings AVOS also owns. They hold 22 positions in common, counted across the 238 positions we hold weights for in AVOS and 101 in QQQ.

Which pays a higher dividend, AVOS or QQQ?

AVOS yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than AVOS?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.