AVUS vs IWV
Avantis US Equity ETF vs iShares Russell 3000 ETF
Which is better, AVUS or IWV?
Nearly the same fund. AVUS costs less.
AVUS has a lower expense ratio. AVUS led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. AVUS is less concentrated, with 29.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AVUS | IWV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15%Best | 0.20% |
| AUM | $14.9B | $20.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.94% | 0.88% |
| Holdings | 1,917 | 5,163 |
| YTD Return | +15.65%Best | +12.89% |
| 1Y Return | +20.98%Best | +16.39% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.87%Best | +21.75% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.65%Best | +11.91% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.6% | 17.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -37.0% | -35.2%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,141Best | $17,553 |
| Top 10 Weight | 29.7%Best | 34.6% |
| Fund Family | Avantis Investors | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 24, 2019 | May 22, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 26, 2019 to Oct 14, 2026 (7 years).
AVUS vs IWV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7 years both funds cover.
AVUS vs IWV Performance
Avantis US Equity ETF (AVUS) is an ETF from Avantis Investors and iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year AVUS returned +20.98% while IWV returned +16.39%. Year to date, AVUS is up 15.65% versus a gain of 12.89% for IWV.
Over three years, AVUS compounded at +21.87% per year against +21.75% for IWV; over five years the annualized figures are +12.65% and +11.91% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, AVUS has the edge at +15.59% annualized vs +15.00%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AVUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.6% compared with 17.0% for IWV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.0% for AVUS and -35.2% for IWV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AVUS charges 0.15% per year while IWV charges 0.20%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $20 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AVUS currently yields 0.94% against 0.88% for IWV.
Holdings Overlap
91.6% of AVUS's money is in holdings IWV also owns. 85.6% of IWV's money is in holdings AVUS also owns.
Most of AVUS is already inside IWV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
1,160 positions in common, counted across the 1,309 positions we hold weights for in AVUS and 2,586 in IWV, against full books of 1,917 and 5,163.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 421 positions for IWV that do not appear in our book for AVUS (10.7% of the fund), and 34 for AVUS that do not appear in IWV (2.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AVUS | Weight in IWV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 5.54% | 7.33% | 1.79% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.63% | 6.50% | 0.87% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.28% | 5.18% | 0.90% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.43% | 3.28% | 0.15% |
| GOOGLAlphabet, Inc. - Class a | 2.00% | 2.68% | 0.68% |
| METAMeta Platforms, Inc. | 2.24% | 2.17% | 0.07% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.31% | 1.68% | 0.63% |
| GOOGAlphabate, Inc Class C | 1.62% | 2.17% | 0.55% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.00% | 2.17% | 1.17% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase & Co | 1.41% | 1.21% | 0.20% |
91.6% of AVUS is already inside IWV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AVUS or IWV?
AVUS has an expense ratio of 0.15% while IWV charges 0.20%. AVUS is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AVUS or IWV?
Over the past year AVUS returned +20.98% vs +16.39% for IWV, so AVUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), AVUS annualized +15.59% vs +15.00% for IWV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AVUS or IWV?
AVUS has been the more volatile fund at 17.6% annualized versus 17.0% for IWV. Worst drawdown: AVUS -37.0% vs IWV -35.2%.
Should I hold both AVUS and IWV?
AVUS and IWV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AVUS and IWV?
91.6% of AVUS's money is in holdings IWV also owns. 85.6% of IWV's is in holdings AVUS also owns. They hold 1,160 positions in common, counted across the 1,309 positions we hold weights for in AVUS and 2,586 in IWV.
Which pays a higher dividend, AVUS or IWV?
AVUS yields 0.94% while IWV yields 0.88%, so AVUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IWV better than AVUS?
AVUS has a lower expense ratio. AVUS led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. AVUS is less concentrated, with 29.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.