AVUS vs YLDE
Avantis US Equity ETF vs Franklin ClearBridge Enhanced Income ETF
Which is better, AVUS or YLDE?
AVUS has been ahead.
AVUS has a lower expense ratio. AVUS led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. AVUS is less concentrated, with 29.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 32.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AVUS | YLDE |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15%Best | 0.48% |
| AUM | $14.9B | $173M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.94% | 7.02% |
| Holdings | 1,917 | 110 |
| YTD Return | +15.65%Best | +8.88% |
| 1Y Return | +20.98%Best | +11.41% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.87%Best | +16.86% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.65%Best | +10.66% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.6% | 15.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -37.0% | -33.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,141Best | $16,594 |
| Top 10 Weight | 29.7%Best | 32.6% |
| Fund Family | Avantis Investors | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 24, 2019 | May 22, 2017 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 26, 2019 to Oct 14, 2026 (7 years).
AVUS vs YLDE growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7 years both funds cover.
AVUS vs YLDE Performance
Avantis US Equity ETF (AVUS) is an ETF from Avantis Investors and Franklin ClearBridge Enhanced Income ETF (YLDE) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US). Over the past year AVUS returned +20.98% while YLDE returned +11.41%. Year to date, AVUS is up 15.65% versus a gain of 8.88% for YLDE.
Over three years, AVUS compounded at +21.87% per year against +16.86% for YLDE; over five years the annualized figures are +12.65% and +10.66% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, AVUS has the edge at +15.59% annualized vs +11.82%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AVUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.6% compared with 15.1% for YLDE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.0% for AVUS and -33.3% for YLDE. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AVUS charges 0.15% per year while YLDE charges 0.48%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $48 annually, a gap of $33 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AVUS currently yields 0.94% against 7.02% for YLDE.
Holdings Overlap
29.1% of AVUS's money is in holdings YLDE also owns. 73.4% of YLDE's money is in holdings AVUS also owns.
Most of YLDE is already inside AVUS. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
34 positions in common, counted across the 1,309 positions we hold weights for in AVUS and 48 in YLDE, against full books of 1,917 and 110.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 10 positions for YLDE that do not appear in our book for AVUS (18.9% of the fund), and 850 for AVUS that do not appear in YLDE (64.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AVUS | Weight in YLDE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 5.54% | 3.50% | 2.04% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 4.28% | 3.67% | 0.61% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.63% | 2.18% | 3.45% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 1.23% | 4.52% | 3.29% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc Cap Stk Cl A | 2.00% | 3.41% | 1.41% |
| WMBWilliams Cos. Inc. | 0.30% | 4.32% | 4.02% |
| METAMeta Platform Inc | 2.24% | 2.10% | 0.14% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.41% | 2.06% | 0.65% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.00% | 2.05% | 1.05% |
| UNPUnion Pacific Corp | 0.46% | 2.45% | 1.99% |
73.4% of YLDE is already inside AVUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AVUS or YLDE?
AVUS has an expense ratio of 0.15% while YLDE charges 0.48%. AVUS is the cheaper option, by $33 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AVUS or YLDE?
Over the past year AVUS returned +20.98% vs +11.41% for YLDE, so AVUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), AVUS annualized +15.59% vs +11.82% for YLDE. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AVUS or YLDE?
AVUS has been the more volatile fund at 17.6% annualized versus 15.1% for YLDE. Worst drawdown: AVUS -37.0% vs YLDE -33.3%.
Should I hold both AVUS and YLDE?
AVUS and YLDE have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AVUS and YLDE?
73.4% of YLDE's money is in holdings AVUS also owns. 73.4% of YLDE's is in holdings AVUS also owns. They hold 34 positions in common, counted across the 1,309 positions we hold weights for in AVUS and 48 in YLDE.
Which pays a higher dividend, AVUS or YLDE?
AVUS yields 0.94% while YLDE yields 7.02%, so YLDE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is YLDE better than AVUS?
AVUS has a lower expense ratio. AVUS led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. AVUS is less concentrated, with 29.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 32.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.