AVUV vs FNDA
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF vs Schwab Fundamental US Small Company ETF
Which is better, AVUV or FNDA?
Small Cap Value against Small Cap Blend.
AVUV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. FNDA is less concentrated, with 3.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 8.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AVUV | FNDA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25%Tie | 0.25%Tie |
| AUM | $31.1B | $8.8B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.28% | 1.26% |
| Holdings | 796 | 918 |
| YTD Return | +16.69%Best | +11.40% |
| 1Y Return | +21.79%Best | +15.53% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.63%Best | +15.25% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.56%Best | +6.71% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 25.4% | 22.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -49.6% | -44.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,519Best | $13,836 |
| Top 10 Weight | 8.2% | 3.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Avantis Investors | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Value | Small Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 24, 2019 | Aug 15, 2013 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 26, 2019 to Oct 14, 2026 (7 years).
AVUV vs FNDA growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7 years both funds cover.
AVUV vs FNDA Performance
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) is an ETF from Avantis Investors and Schwab Fundamental US Small Company ETF (FNDA) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year AVUV returned +21.79% while FNDA returned +15.53%. Year to date, AVUV is up 16.69% versus a gain of 11.40% for FNDA.
Over three years, AVUV compounded at +17.63% per year against +15.25% for FNDA; over five years the annualized figures are +10.56% and +6.71% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, AVUV has the edge at +14.54% annualized vs +10.37%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AVUV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.4% compared with 22.7% for FNDA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -49.6% for AVUV and -44.6% for FNDA. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AVUV charges 0.25% per year while FNDA charges 0.25%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $25 annually. On income, AVUV currently yields 1.28% against 1.26% for FNDA.
Holdings Overlap
51.8% of AVUV's money is in holdings FNDA also owns. 28.3% of FNDA's money is in holdings AVUV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
295 positions in common, counted across the 742 positions we hold weights for in AVUV and 910 in FNDA, against full books of 796 and 918.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 599 positions for FNDA that do not appear in our book for AVUV (70.3% of the fund), and 378 for AVUV that do not appear in FNDA (43.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AVUV | Weight in FNDA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ANFAbercrombie & Fitch Co. Class A | 0.86% | 0.40% | 0.46% |
| VSATViasat Inc | 0.79% | 0.28% | 0.51% |
| GATXGatx Corp | 0.86% | 0.16% | 0.70% |
| LNTHLantheus Holdings Inc - Common | 0.87% | 0.12% | 0.75% |
| INSWInternational Seaways, Inc. | 0.65% | 0.24% | 0.41% |
| URBNUrban Outfitters Inc | 0.61% | 0.27% | 0.34% |
| CBTCabot Corp | 0.69% | 0.18% | 0.51% |
| PARRPar Petroleum Corp | 0.53% | 0.33% | 0.20% |
| SKYWSkywest Inc | 0.69% | 0.16% | 0.53% |
| MGYMagnolia Oil & Gas Corp | 0.63% | 0.22% | 0.41% |
51.8% of AVUV is already inside FNDA.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AVUV or FNDA?
AVUV has an expense ratio of 0.25% while FNDA charges 0.25%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, AVUV or FNDA?
Over the past year AVUV returned +21.79% vs +15.53% for FNDA, so AVUV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), AVUV annualized +14.54% vs +10.37% for FNDA. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AVUV or FNDA?
AVUV has been the more volatile fund at 25.4% annualized versus 22.7% for FNDA. Worst drawdown: AVUV -49.6% vs FNDA -44.6%.
Should I hold both AVUV and FNDA?
AVUV and FNDA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AVUV and FNDA?
51.8% of AVUV's money is in holdings FNDA also owns. 28.3% of FNDA's is in holdings AVUV also owns. They hold 295 positions in common, counted across the 742 positions we hold weights for in AVUV and 910 in FNDA.
Which pays a higher dividend, AVUV or FNDA?
AVUV yields 1.28% while FNDA yields 1.26%, so AVUV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FNDA better than AVUV?
AVUV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. FNDA is less concentrated, with 3.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 8.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.