AWEG vs JMID

AWEG vs JMID

Which is better, AWEG or JMID?

JMID has been ahead.

JMID has a lower expense ratio. JMID led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: JMIDHigher Returns: JMID

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAWEGJMID
Expense Ratio0.65%0.30%Best
AUM$5M$23M
Dividend Yield3.70%0.53%
Holdings2594
Volatility (annualized)20.1%19.1%Best
Max Drawdown-27.0%-25.4%Best
$10,000 over 1.3 years$9,614$12,127Best
Fund FamilyAlgerJanus Henderson Investors
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap GrowthMid Cap Growth
InceptionMar 6, 2023Sep 17, 2024

Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.

The two price series end 294 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. AWEG has data through Dec 24, 2025 and JMID through Oct 14, 2026.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 18, 2024 to Dec 24, 2025 (1.3 years).

Compare AWEG against instead:AWEG vs SPYAWEG vs QQQAWEG vs VOOAWEG vs VTIJMID against:JMID vs VXUS

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

AWEG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.1% compared with 19.1% for JMID. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.0% for AWEG and -25.4% for JMID. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AWEG charges 0.65% per year while JMID charges 0.30%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $30 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AWEG currently yields 3.70% against 0.53% for JMID.

Holdings Overlap

JMID already in AWEG0.7%

At least 0.7% of JMID's money is in holdings AWEG also owns.

Stated as a floor: for AWEG, our book for it covers 90.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.

We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.

The two holdings books were reported 319 days apart, AWEG as of Oct 31, 2025 and JMID as of Sep 15, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

1 positions in common, counted across the 23 positions we hold weights for in AWEG and 93 in JMID, against full books of 25 and 94.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in AWEGWeight in JMIDDifference
PCTYPaylocity Holding Corp4.63%0.70%3.93%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of AWEG and JMID you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

AWEGJMID

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AWEG or JMID?

AWEG has an expense ratio of 0.65% while JMID charges 0.30%. JMID is the cheaper option, by $35 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which is riskier, AWEG or JMID?

AWEG has been the more volatile fund at 20.1% annualized versus 19.1% for JMID. Worst drawdown: AWEG -27.0% vs JMID -25.4%.

Should I hold both AWEG and JMID?

AWEG and JMID have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, AWEG or JMID?

AWEG yields 3.70% while JMID yields 0.53%, so AWEG currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is JMID better than AWEG?

JMID has a lower expense ratio. JMID led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.