BABX vs MSOX
GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF vs AdvisorShares MSOS Daily Leveraged ETF
Which is better, BABX or MSOX?
BABX has been ahead.
MSOX has a lower expense ratio. BABX led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BABX | MSOX |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.15% | 0.97%Best |
| AUM | $123M | $44M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 4 | 15 |
| YTD Return | -57.48%Best | -57.95% |
| 1Y Return | -62.87%Best | -77.48% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -2.66%Best | -71.96% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 94.0%Best | 160.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -78.8% | - |
| $10,000 over 3.8 years | $6,664Best | $90 |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | AdvisorShares Trust |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Trading-Leveraged Equity |
| Inception | Dec 13, 2022 | Aug 23, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 13, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.8 years).
BABX vs MSOX growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.8 years both funds cover.
BABX vs MSOX Performance
GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) is an ETF from GraniteShares and AdvisorShares MSOS Daily Leveraged ETF (MSOX) is an ETF from AdvisorShares Trust. Over the past year BABX returned -62.87% while MSOX returned -77.48%. Year to date, BABX is down 57.48% versus a loss of 57.95% for MSOX.
Over three years, BABX compounded at -2.66% per year against -71.96% for MSOX. Across the full 4-year window we track, BABX has the edge at -10.13% annualized vs -71.02%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MSOX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 160.7% compared with 94.0% for BABX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.01. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BABX charges 1.15% per year while MSOX charges 0.97%. On a $10,000 position that is $115 vs $97 annually, a gap of $18 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BABX currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for MSOX.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BABX and MSOX you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BABX or MSOX?
BABX has an expense ratio of 1.15% while MSOX charges 0.97%. MSOX is the cheaper option, by $18 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BABX or MSOX?
Over the past year BABX returned -62.87% vs -77.48% for MSOX, so BABX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), BABX annualized -10.13% vs -71.02% for MSOX. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BABX or MSOX?
MSOX has been the more volatile fund at 160.7% annualized versus 94.0% for BABX.
Should I hold both BABX and MSOX?
BABX and MSOX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.01, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BABX or MSOX?
BABX yields 0.00% while MSOX yields 0.00%, so MSOX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MSOX better than BABX?
MSOX has a lower expense ratio. BABX led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.