BABX vs TSL
GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF vs GraniteShares 1.25x Long TSLA Daily ETF
Which is better, BABX or TSL?
TSL has been ahead.
TSL led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BABX | TSL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.15%Tie | 1.15%Tie |
| AUM | $123M | $12M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 4 | 4 |
| YTD Return | -57.48% | -23.76%Best |
| 1Y Return | -62.87% | -22.82%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -2.66% | +5.98%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 94.0% | 70.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -78.8% | -63.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.8 years | $6,664 | $18,847Best |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | GraniteShares |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Trading-Leveraged Equity |
| Inception | Dec 13, 2022 | Aug 9, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 13, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.8 years).
BABX vs TSL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.8 years both funds cover.
BABX vs TSL Performance
GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) is an ETF from GraniteShares and GraniteShares 1.25x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSL) is an ETF from GraniteShares. Over the past year BABX returned -62.87% while TSL returned -22.82%. Year to date, BABX is down 57.48% versus a loss of 23.76% for TSL.
Over three years, BABX compounded at -2.66% per year against +5.98% for TSL. Across the full 4-year window we track, TSL has the edge at +18.15% annualized vs -10.13%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BABX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 94.0% compared with 70.2% for TSL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -78.8% for BABX and -63.3% for TSL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.05. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BABX charges 1.15% per year while TSL charges 1.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $115 vs $115 annually. On income, BABX currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for TSL.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BABX and TSL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BABX or TSL?
BABX has an expense ratio of 1.15% while TSL charges 1.15%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, BABX or TSL?
Over the past year BABX returned -62.87% vs -22.82% for TSL, so TSL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), BABX annualized -10.13% vs +18.15% for TSL. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BABX or TSL?
BABX has been the more volatile fund at 94.0% annualized versus 70.2% for TSL. Worst drawdown: BABX -78.8% vs TSL -63.3%.
Should I hold both BABX and TSL?
BABX and TSL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.05, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BABX or TSL?
BABX yields 0.00% while TSL yields 0.00%, so TSL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TSL better than BABX?
TSL led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.