BAFE vs GGTL
Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF vs Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF
Which is better, BAFE or GGTL?
GGTL has been ahead.
GGTL has a lower expense ratio. GGTL led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BAFE | GGTL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.54% | 0.00%Best |
| AUM | $1.8B | $16M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.27% | 0.82% |
| Holdings | 90 | 149 |
| YTD Return | +9.97% | +21.53%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.65% | +22.76%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.64% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.2%Best | 20.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.4%Best | -21.5% |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $12,035 | $14,387Best |
| Fund Family | Brown Advisory | Gabelli Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 18, 2024 | Jan 5, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 18, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.9 years).
BAFE vs GGTL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.
BAFE vs GGTL Performance
Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF (BAFE) is an ETF from Brown Advisory and Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF (GGTL) is an ETF from Gabelli Funds. Over the past year BAFE returned +12.65% while GGTL returned +22.76%. Year to date, BAFE is up 9.97% versus a gain of 21.53% for GGTL.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GGTL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.7% compared with 13.2% for BAFE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.4% for BAFE and -21.5% for GGTL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BAFE charges 0.54% per year while GGTL charges 0.00%. On a $10,000 position that is $54 vs $0 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAFE currently yields 0.27% against 0.82% for GGTL.
Holdings Overlap
At least 30.5% of BAFE's money is in holdings GGTL also owns.
Stated as a floor: for GGTL, our book for it covers 85.0% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
7 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in BAFE and 70 in GGTL, against full books of 90 and 149.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BAFE | Weight in GGTL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 7.75% | 7.42% | 0.33% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.49% | 1.84% | 4.65% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 3.84% | 2.32% | 1.52% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.42% | 0.84% | 3.58% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.72% | 0.31% | 3.41% |
| ADIAnalog Devices, Inc. | 1.99% | 1.05% | 0.94% |
| KLACKla-tencor | 2.28% | 0.62% | 1.66% |
30.5% of BAFE is already inside GGTL.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BAFE or GGTL?
BAFE has an expense ratio of 0.54% while GGTL charges 0.00%. GGTL is the cheaper option, by $54 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BAFE or GGTL?
Over the past year BAFE returned +12.65% vs +22.76% for GGTL, so GGTL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BAFE annualized +10.24% vs +21.10% for GGTL. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BAFE or GGTL?
GGTL has been the more volatile fund at 20.7% annualized versus 13.2% for BAFE. Worst drawdown: BAFE -18.4% vs GGTL -21.5%.
Should I hold both BAFE and GGTL?
BAFE and GGTL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BAFE and GGTL?
At least 30.5% of BAFE's money is in holdings GGTL also owns. Our book for GGTL is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in BAFE and 70 in GGTL.
Which pays a higher dividend, BAFE or GGTL?
BAFE yields 0.27% while GGTL yields 0.82%, so GGTL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is GGTL better than BAFE?
GGTL has a lower expense ratio. GGTL led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.