BAFE vs HRSK
Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF vs Toews Agility Shares Hedged Risk ETF
Which is better, BAFE or HRSK?
BAFE costs less.
BAFE has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BAFE | HRSK |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.54%Best | 0.95% |
| AUM | $1.8B | $35M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.27% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 90 | 121 |
| YTD Return | +10.99%Best | +0.16% |
| 1Y Return | +13.45% | - |
| Fund Family | Brown Advisory | TOEWS Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 18, 2024 | Jun 15, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
BAFE vs HRSK growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BAFE vs HRSK Performance
Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF (BAFE) is an ETF from Brown Advisory and Toews Agility Shares Hedged Risk ETF (HRSK) is an ETF from TOEWS Funds. Year to date, BAFE is up 10.99% versus a gain of 0.16% for HRSK.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BAFE charges 0.54% per year while HRSK charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $54 vs $95 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAFE currently yields 0.27% against 0.00% for HRSK.
Holdings Overlap
At least 44.6% of BAFE's money is in holdings HRSK also owns.
Stated as a floor: for HRSK, our book for it covers 58.5% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
14 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in BAFE and 117 in HRSK, against full books of 90 and 121.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BAFE | Weight in HRSK | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.49% | 2.50% | 3.99% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.42% | 0.96% | 3.46% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 4.60% | 0.64% | 3.96% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 3.84% | 1.31% | 2.53% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 1.90% | 3.03% | 1.13% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.72% | 0.73% | 2.99% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 4.22% | 0.19% | 4.03% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 3.54% | 0.30% | 3.24% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group, Inc. | 2.82% | 0.52% | 2.30% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity | 3.11% | 0.09% | 3.02% |
44.6% of BAFE is already inside HRSK.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BAFE or HRSK?
BAFE has an expense ratio of 0.54% while HRSK charges 0.95%. BAFE is the cheaper option, by $41 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between BAFE and HRSK?
At least 44.6% of BAFE's money is in holdings HRSK also owns. Our book for HRSK is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 14 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in BAFE and 117 in HRSK.
Which pays a higher dividend, BAFE or HRSK?
BAFE yields 0.27% while HRSK yields 0.00%, so BAFE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is HRSK better than BAFE?
BAFE has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.