BAFE vs JLCO
Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF vs John Hancock Large Cap Opportunities ETF
Which is better, BAFE or JLCO?
JLCO costs less.
JLCO has a lower expense ratio. BAFE is less concentrated, with 45.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BAFE | JLCO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.54% | 0.39%Best |
| AUM | $1.8B | $11M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.27% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 90 | 108 |
| YTD Return | +9.97%Best | +2.73% |
| 1Y Return | +12.65% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 45.4%Best | 47.1% |
| Fund Family | Brown Advisory | John Hancock Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 18, 2024 | Jul 14, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
BAFE vs JLCO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BAFE vs JLCO Performance
Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF (BAFE) is an ETF from Brown Advisory and John Hancock Large Cap Opportunities ETF (JLCO) is an ETF from John Hancock Investment Management. Year to date, BAFE is up 9.97% versus a gain of 2.73% for JLCO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BAFE charges 0.54% per year while JLCO charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $54 vs $39 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAFE currently yields 0.27% against 0.00% for JLCO.
Holdings Overlap
24.4% of BAFE's money is in holdings JLCO also owns. 29.6% of JLCO's money is in holdings BAFE also owns.
JLCO and BAFE share little of their money.
6 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in BAFE and 55 in JLCO, against full books of 90 and 108.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 43 positions for JLCO that do not appear in our book for BAFE (64.5% of the fund), and 32 for BAFE that do not appear in JLCO (61.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
29.6% of JLCO is already inside BAFE.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BAFE or JLCO?
BAFE has an expense ratio of 0.54% while JLCO charges 0.39%. JLCO is the cheaper option, by $15 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between BAFE and JLCO?
29.6% of JLCO's money is in holdings BAFE also owns. 29.6% of JLCO's is in holdings BAFE also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in BAFE and 55 in JLCO.
Which pays a higher dividend, BAFE or JLCO?
BAFE yields 0.27% while JLCO yields 0.00%, so BAFE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is JLCO better than BAFE?
JLCO has a lower expense ratio. BAFE is less concentrated, with 45.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.