BAFE vs LCTO
Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF vs Kurv US Large Cap TaxOptimized ETF
Which is better, BAFE or LCTO?
BAFE costs less.
BAFE has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BAFE | LCTO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.54%Best | 0.70% |
| AUM | $1.8B | $501,400.12 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.27% | 0.38% |
| Holdings | 90 | 29 |
| YTD Return | +9.97%Best | -0.55% |
| 1Y Return | +12.65% | - |
| Fund Family | Brown Advisory | Kurv |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 18, 2024 | Jul 6, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
BAFE vs LCTO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BAFE vs LCTO Performance
Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF (BAFE) is an ETF from Brown Advisory and Kurv US Large Cap TaxOptimized ETF (LCTO) is an ETF from Kurv. Year to date, BAFE is up 9.97% versus a loss of 0.55% for LCTO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BAFE charges 0.54% per year while LCTO charges 0.70%. On a $10,000 position that is $54 vs $70 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAFE currently yields 0.27% against 0.38% for LCTO.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 42 holdings in BAFE and 10 in LCTO, totalling 98.4% and 94.7% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in BAFE and 10 in LCTO, against full books of 90 and 29.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BAFE and LCTO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BAFE or LCTO?
BAFE has an expense ratio of 0.54% while LCTO charges 0.70%. BAFE is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, BAFE or LCTO?
BAFE yields 0.27% while LCTO yields 0.38%, so LCTO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is LCTO better than BAFE?
BAFE has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.