BAFE vs NTSX
Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF vs WisdomTree US Efficient Core Fund
Which is better, BAFE or NTSX?
Each has led over a different period.
NTSX has a lower expense ratio. BAFE led over 1Y, NTSX over the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BAFE | NTSX |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.54% | 0.20%Best |
| AUM | $1.8B | $1.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.27% | 1.08% |
| Holdings | 90 | 506 |
| YTD Return | +9.97%Best | +8.74% |
| 1Y Return | +12.65%Best | +10.97% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.03% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.36% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.2% | 12.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.4% | -16.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $12,035 | $12,833Best |
| Fund Family | Brown Advisory | WisdomTree Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 18, 2024 | Aug 2, 2018 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 18, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.9 years).
BAFE vs NTSX growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.
BAFE vs NTSX Performance
Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF (BAFE) is an ETF from Brown Advisory and WisdomTree US Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments. Over the past year BAFE returned +12.65% while NTSX returned +10.97%. Year to date, BAFE is up 9.97% versus a gain of 8.74% for NTSX.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BAFE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.2% compared with 12.1% for NTSX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.4% for BAFE and -16.8% for NTSX. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BAFE charges 0.54% per year while NTSX charges 0.20%. On a $10,000 position that is $54 vs $20 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAFE currently yields 0.27% against 1.08% for NTSX.
Holdings Overlap
At least 69.6% of BAFE's money is in holdings NTSX also owns.
Stated as a floor: for NTSX, our book for it covers 90.8% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
30 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in BAFE and 501 in NTSX, against full books of 90 and 506.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BAFE | Weight in NTSX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.49% | 5.07% | 1.42% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 3.84% | 7.11% | 3.27% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.72% | 5.71% | 1.99% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 1.90% | 6.82% | 4.92% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.42% | 3.53% | 0.89% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 4.60% | 2.23% | 2.37% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 4.22% | 1.01% | 3.21% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 3.73% | 0.72% | 3.01% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group, Inc. | 2.82% | 0.45% | 2.37% |
| KKRKkr & Co. Inc. Class a | 2.89% | 0.12% | 2.77% |
69.6% of BAFE is already inside NTSX.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BAFE or NTSX?
BAFE has an expense ratio of 0.54% while NTSX charges 0.20%. NTSX is the cheaper option, by $34 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BAFE or NTSX?
Over the past year BAFE returned +12.65% vs +10.97% for NTSX, so BAFE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BAFE annualized +10.24% vs +14.03% for NTSX. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BAFE or NTSX?
BAFE has been the more volatile fund at 13.2% annualized versus 12.1% for NTSX. Worst drawdown: BAFE -18.4% vs NTSX -16.8%.
Should I hold both BAFE and NTSX?
BAFE and NTSX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BAFE and NTSX?
At least 69.6% of BAFE's money is in holdings NTSX also owns. Our book for NTSX is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 30 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in BAFE and 501 in NTSX.
Which pays a higher dividend, BAFE or NTSX?
BAFE yields 0.27% while NTSX yields 1.08%, so NTSX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NTSX better than BAFE?
NTSX has a lower expense ratio. BAFE led over 1Y, NTSX over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.