BAFE vs NUDG

BAFE vs NUDG

Which is better, BAFE or NUDG?

BAFE has been ahead.

BAFE has a lower expense ratio. BAFE led over 1Y. NUDG is less concentrated, with 42.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.4%.

Lower Fees: BAFEHigher Returns (1Y): BAFELess Concentrated: NUDG

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBAFENUDG
Expense Ratio0.54%Best0.61%
AUM$1.8B$6.2B
Dividend Yield0.27%0.50%
Holdings9043
YTD Return+9.97%Best+2.67%
1Y Return+12.65%-
Top 10 Weight45.4%42.3%Best
Fund FamilyBrown AdvisoryNuveen
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionNov 18, 2024Jun 2, 2026

Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

BAFE vs NUDG growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare BAFE against instead:BAFE vs SPYBAFE vs QQQBAFE vs VOOBAFE vs VTINUDG against:NUDG vs VXUS

BAFE vs NUDG Performance

Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF (BAFE) is an ETF from Brown Advisory and Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF (NUDG) is an ETF from Nuveen. Year to date, BAFE is up 9.97% versus a gain of 2.67% for NUDG.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BAFE charges 0.54% per year while NUDG charges 0.61%. On a $10,000 position that is $54 vs $61 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAFE currently yields 0.27% against 0.50% for NUDG.

Holdings Overlap

BAFE already in NUDG34.3%
NUDG already in BAFE35.3%

34.3% of BAFE's money is in holdings NUDG also owns. 35.3% of NUDG's money is in holdings BAFE also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

11 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in BAFE and 42 in NUDG, against full books of 90 and 43.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 31 positions for NUDG that do not appear in our book for BAFE (63.6% of the fund), and 27 for BAFE that do not appear in NUDG (56.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BAFEWeight in NUDGDifference
MSFTMicrosoft Corp6.49%7.67%1.18%
2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd7.75%4.47%3.28%
AAPLApple, Inc1.90%6.37%4.47%
GOOGAlphabet Inc. C3.54%3.68%0.14%
MAMastercard Inc3.73%2.54%1.19%
ELVElevance Health Inc1.94%2.17%0.23%
DHRDanaher Corporation2.35%1.75%0.60%
BKNGBooking Holdings, Inc.2.04%1.93%0.11%
ADIAnalog Devices, Inc.1.99%1.84%0.15%
TJXTjx Cos., Inc.1.18%1.81%0.63%

35.3% of NUDG is already inside BAFE.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

BAFENUDG

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BAFE or NUDG?

BAFE has an expense ratio of 0.54% while NUDG charges 0.61%. BAFE is the cheaper option, by $7 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between BAFE and NUDG?

35.3% of NUDG's money is in holdings BAFE also owns. 35.3% of NUDG's is in holdings BAFE also owns. They hold 11 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in BAFE and 42 in NUDG.

Which pays a higher dividend, BAFE or NUDG?

BAFE yields 0.27% while NUDG yields 0.50%, so NUDG currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is NUDG better than BAFE?

BAFE has a lower expense ratio. BAFE led over 1Y. NUDG is less concentrated, with 42.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.