BAGX vs QQQ

BAGX vs QQQ

Which is better, BAGX or QQQ?

Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. BAGX is less concentrated, with 30.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns (1Y): QQQLess Concentrated: BAGX

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBAGXQQQ
Expense Ratio0.73%0.18%Best
AUM$202M$506.1B
Dividend Yield0.00%0.42%
Holdings94321
YTD Return+4.87%+19.30%Best
1Y Return-+22.47%
3Y Return (annualized)-+26.18%
5Y Return (annualized)-+15.42%
Top 10 Weight30.1%Best46.7%
Fund FamilyBridgeway FundsInvesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Growth
InceptionJul 24, 2026Mar 10, 1999

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

BAGX vs QQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

BAGX vs QQQ Performance

EA Bridgeway Aggressive Investors ETF (BAGX) is an ETF from Bridgeway Funds and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, BAGX is up 4.87% versus a gain of 19.30% for QQQ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BAGX charges 0.73% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $73 vs $18 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAGX currently yields 0.00% against 0.42% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

BAGX already in QQQ36.9%
QQQ already in BAGX46.9%

36.9% of BAGX's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 46.9% of QQQ's money is in holdings BAGX also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

20 positions in common, counted across the 94 positions we hold weights for in BAGX and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 94 and 321.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 72 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for BAGX (49.4% of the fund), and 68 for BAGX that do not appear in QQQ (59.5%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BAGXWeight in QQQDifference
NVDANvidia Corp5.56%8.33%2.77%
AAPLApple, Inc4.73%7.35%2.62%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp3.70%5.76%2.06%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.2.39%5.02%2.63%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc4.06%3.05%1.01%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc2.01%4.17%2.16%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc1.61%4.07%2.46%
LRCXLrcx Uw Equity2.05%1.72%0.33%
AMATApplied Materials, Inc.1.79%1.70%0.09%
MRVLMarvell Technology Inc1.20%0.97%0.23%

46.9% of QQQ is already inside BAGX.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

BAGXQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BAGX or QQQ?

BAGX has an expense ratio of 0.73% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $55 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between BAGX and QQQ?

46.9% of QQQ's money is in holdings BAGX also owns. 46.9% of QQQ's is in holdings BAGX also owns. They hold 20 positions in common, counted across the 94 positions we hold weights for in BAGX and 101 in QQQ.

Which pays a higher dividend, BAGX or QQQ?

BAGX yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than BAGX?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. BAGX is less concentrated, with 30.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.