BAI vs CGGR
iShares AI Innovation and Tech Active ETF vs Capital Group Growth ETF
Which is better, BAI or CGGR?
BAI has been ahead.
CGGR has a lower expense ratio. BAI led over 1Y and the full window. CGGR is less concentrated, with 40.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BAI | CGGR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.39%Best |
| AUM | $14.2B | $26.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.26% | 0.15% |
| Holdings | 55 | 97 |
| YTD Return | +30.13%Best | +6.35% |
| 1Y Return | +30.79%Best | +8.20% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +24.14% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 37.4% | 17.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -34.1% | -23.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $18,007Best | $13,419 |
| Top 10 Weight | 42.0% | 40.8%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Capital Group (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Oct 21, 2024 | Feb 22, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 22, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2 years).
BAI vs CGGR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
BAI vs CGGR Performance
iShares AI Innovation and Tech Active ETF (BAI) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR) is an ETF from Capital Group (US). Over the past year BAI returned +30.79% while CGGR returned +8.20%. Year to date, BAI is up 30.13% versus a gain of 6.35% for CGGR.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BAI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 37.4% compared with 17.5% for CGGR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.1% for BAI and -23.4% for CGGR. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BAI charges 0.55% per year while CGGR charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $39 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAI currently yields 1.26% against 0.15% for CGGR.
Holdings Overlap
42.9% of BAI's money is in holdings CGGR also owns. 33.2% of CGGR's money is in holdings BAI also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
15 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in BAI and 96 in CGGR, against full books of 55 and 97.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 70 positions for CGGR that do not appear in our book for BAI (60.4% of the fund), and 23 for BAI that do not appear in CGGR (37.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BAI | Weight in CGGR | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 5.30% | 5.07% | 0.23% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 6.46% | 3.88% | 2.58% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.75% | 4.43% | 0.32% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 2.13% | 4.66% | 2.53% |
| 2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 4.74% | 1.57% | 3.17% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 2.49% | 3.10% | 0.61% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 0.94% | 4.17% | 3.23% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.05% | 2.38% | 0.33% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 2.90% | 1.43% | 1.47% |
| SPCXSpace Exploration Technologies | 3.06% | 0.18% | 2.88% |
42.9% of BAI is already inside CGGR.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BAI or CGGR?
BAI has an expense ratio of 0.55% while CGGR charges 0.39%. CGGR is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BAI or CGGR?
Over the past year BAI returned +30.79% vs +8.20% for CGGR, so BAI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BAI annualized +34.19% vs +15.84% for CGGR. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BAI or CGGR?
BAI has been the more volatile fund at 37.4% annualized versus 17.5% for CGGR. Worst drawdown: BAI -34.1% vs CGGR -23.4%.
Should I hold both BAI and CGGR?
BAI and CGGR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BAI and CGGR?
42.9% of BAI's money is in holdings CGGR also owns. 33.2% of CGGR's is in holdings BAI also owns. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in BAI and 96 in CGGR.
Which pays a higher dividend, BAI or CGGR?
BAI yields 1.26% while CGGR yields 0.15%, so BAI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is CGGR better than BAI?
CGGR has a lower expense ratio. BAI led over 1Y and the full window. CGGR is less concentrated, with 40.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.