BAI vs GK
iShares AI Innovation and Tech Active ETF vs AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF
Which is better, BAI or GK?
BAI has been ahead.
BAI has a lower expense ratio. BAI led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. BAI is less concentrated, with 42.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BAI | GK |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55%Best | 0.77% |
| AUM | $14.2B | $32M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.26% | 0.07% |
| Holdings | 55 | 60 |
| YTD Return | +30.13%Best | +10.81% |
| 1Y Return | +30.79%Best | +8.34% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.66% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +2.56% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 37.4% | 19.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -34.1% | -23.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $18,007Best | $13,071 |
| Top 10 Weight | 42.0%Best | 62.7% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Advisor Shares |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Oct 21, 2024 | Jul 1, 2021 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 22, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2 years).
BAI vs GK growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
BAI vs GK Performance
iShares AI Innovation and Tech Active ETF (BAI) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) is an ETF from Advisor Shares. Over the past year BAI returned +30.79% while GK returned +8.34%. Year to date, BAI is up 30.13% versus a gain of 10.81% for GK.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BAI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 37.4% compared with 19.7% for GK. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.1% for BAI and -23.6% for GK. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BAI charges 0.55% per year while GK charges 0.77%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $77 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAI currently yields 1.26% against 0.07% for GK.
Holdings Overlap
23.7% of BAI's money is in holdings GK also owns. 38.5% of GK's money is in holdings BAI also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
7 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in BAI and 27 in GK, against full books of 55 and 60.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 19 positions for GK that do not appear in our book for BAI (60.0% of the fund), and 29 for BAI that do not appear in GK (50.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
38.5% of GK is already inside BAI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BAI or GK?
BAI has an expense ratio of 0.55% while GK charges 0.77%. BAI is the cheaper option, by $22 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BAI or GK?
Over the past year BAI returned +30.79% vs +8.34% for GK, so BAI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BAI annualized +34.19% vs +14.33% for GK. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BAI or GK?
BAI has been the more volatile fund at 37.4% annualized versus 19.7% for GK. Worst drawdown: BAI -34.1% vs GK -23.6%.
Should I hold both BAI and GK?
BAI and GK have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BAI and GK?
38.5% of GK's money is in holdings BAI also owns. 38.5% of GK's is in holdings BAI also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in BAI and 27 in GK.
Which pays a higher dividend, BAI or GK?
BAI yields 1.26% while GK yields 0.07%, so BAI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is GK better than BAI?
BAI has a lower expense ratio. BAI led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. BAI is less concentrated, with 42.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.