BAI vs LRGC
iShares AI Innovation and Tech Active ETF vs AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF
Which is better, BAI or LRGC?
BAI has been ahead.
LRGC has a lower expense ratio. BAI led over 1Y and the full window. BAI is less concentrated, with 42.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BAI | LRGC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.39%Best |
| AUM | $14.2B | $1.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.26% | 0.53% |
| Holdings | 55 | 72 |
| YTD Return | +30.13%Best | +10.99% |
| 1Y Return | +30.79%Best | +13.29% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.81% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 37.4% | 13.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -34.1% | -19.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $18,007Best | $12,960 |
| Top 10 Weight | 42.0%Best | 44.8% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | AllianceBernstein L.P. |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Oct 21, 2024 | Sep 20, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 22, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2 years).
BAI vs LRGC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
BAI vs LRGC Performance
iShares AI Innovation and Tech Active ETF (BAI) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC) is an ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P.. Over the past year BAI returned +30.79% while LRGC returned +13.29%. Year to date, BAI is up 30.13% versus a gain of 10.99% for LRGC.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BAI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 37.4% compared with 13.2% for LRGC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.1% for BAI and -19.4% for LRGC. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BAI charges 0.55% per year while LRGC charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $39 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAI currently yields 1.26% against 0.53% for LRGC.
Holdings Overlap
28.3% of BAI's money is in holdings LRGC also owns. 26.0% of LRGC's money is in holdings BAI also owns.
BAI and LRGC share little of their money.
7 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in BAI and 69 in LRGC, against full books of 55 and 72.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 59 positions for LRGC that do not appear in our book for BAI (71.3% of the fund), and 30 for BAI that do not appear in LRGC (50.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BAI | Weight in LRGC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 5.30% | 8.71% | 3.41% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 2.13% | 6.66% | 4.53% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.75% | 2.93% | 1.82% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 6.46% | 0.76% | 5.70% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.05% | 4.69% | 2.64% |
| 2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 4.74% | 1.33% | 3.41% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 2.90% | 0.95% | 1.95% |
28.3% of BAI is already inside LRGC.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BAI or LRGC?
BAI has an expense ratio of 0.55% while LRGC charges 0.39%. LRGC is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BAI or LRGC?
Over the past year BAI returned +30.79% vs +13.29% for LRGC, so BAI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BAI annualized +34.19% vs +13.84% for LRGC. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BAI or LRGC?
BAI has been the more volatile fund at 37.4% annualized versus 13.2% for LRGC. Worst drawdown: BAI -34.1% vs LRGC -19.4%.
Should I hold both BAI and LRGC?
BAI and LRGC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BAI and LRGC?
28.3% of BAI's money is in holdings LRGC also owns. 26.0% of LRGC's is in holdings BAI also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in BAI and 69 in LRGC.
Which pays a higher dividend, BAI or LRGC?
BAI yields 1.26% while LRGC yields 0.53%, so BAI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is LRGC better than BAI?
LRGC has a lower expense ratio. BAI led over 1Y and the full window. BAI is less concentrated, with 42.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.