BAI vs NQLT

BAI vs NQLT

Which is better, BAI or NQLT?

NQLT costs less.

NQLT has a lower expense ratio. BAI is less concentrated, with 42.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.6%.

Lower Fees: NQLTLess Concentrated: BAI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBAINQLT
Expense Ratio0.55%0.48%Best
AUM$14.2B$50M
Dividend Yield1.26%0.00%
Holdings5563
YTD Return+28.12%Best+3.05%
1Y Return+26.26%-
Top 10 Weight42.0%Best51.6%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Neuberger Berman
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionOct 21, 2024Jul 10, 2026

Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

BAI vs NQLT growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare BAI against instead:BAI vs SPYBAI vs QQQBAI vs VOOBAI vs VTINQLT against:NQLT vs VXUS

BAI vs NQLT Performance

iShares AI Innovation and Tech Active ETF (BAI) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Neuberger Quality Select ETF (NQLT) is an ETF from Neuberger Berman. Year to date, BAI is up 28.12% versus a gain of 3.05% for NQLT.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BAI charges 0.55% per year while NQLT charges 0.48%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $48 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAI currently yields 1.26% against 0.00% for NQLT.

Holdings Overlap

BAI already in NQLT22.0%
NQLT already in BAI28.7%

22.0% of BAI's money is in holdings NQLT also owns. 28.7% of NQLT's money is in holdings BAI also owns.

NQLT and BAI share little of their money.

7 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in BAI and 63 in NQLT, against full books of 55 and 63.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 53 positions for NQLT that do not appear in our book for BAI (65.7% of the fund), and 30 for BAI that do not appear in NQLT (56.7%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BAIWeight in NQLTDifference
NVDANvidia Corp5.30%6.09%0.79%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp2.13%7.64%5.51%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc2.05%7.67%5.62%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc2.49%3.68%1.19%
2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd4.74%0.88%3.86%
SPCXSpace Exploration Technologies3.06%1.38%1.68%
ANETArista Networks Inc Common Stock2.27%1.35%0.92%

28.7% of NQLT is already inside BAI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

BAINQLT

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BAI or NQLT?

BAI has an expense ratio of 0.55% while NQLT charges 0.48%. NQLT is the cheaper option, by $7 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between BAI and NQLT?

28.7% of NQLT's money is in holdings BAI also owns. 28.7% of NQLT's is in holdings BAI also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in BAI and 63 in NQLT.

Which pays a higher dividend, BAI or NQLT?

BAI yields 1.26% while NQLT yields 0.00%, so BAI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is NQLT better than BAI?

NQLT has a lower expense ratio. BAI is less concentrated, with 42.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.