BALI vs NQLT

BALI vs NQLT

Which is better, BALI or NQLT?

BALI costs less.

BALI has a lower expense ratio. BALI is less concentrated, with 35.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.6%.

Lower Fees: BALILess Concentrated: BALI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBALINQLT
Expense Ratio0.35%Best0.48%
AUM$1.5B$50M
Dividend Yield7.81%0.00%
Holdings20663
YTD Return+11.92%Best+2.29%
1Y Return+15.74%-
3Y Return (annualized)+19.08%-
Top 10 Weight35.0%Best51.6%
Fund FamilyBlackRock, Inc. (US)Neuberger Berman
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionSep 26, 2023Jul 10, 2026

Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

BALI vs NQLT growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare BALI against instead:BALI vs SPYBALI vs QQQBALI vs VOOBALI vs VTINQLT against:NQLT vs VXUS

BALI vs NQLT Performance

iShares US Large Cap Premium Income Active ETF (BALI) is an ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US) and Neuberger Quality Select ETF (NQLT) is an ETF from Neuberger Berman. Year to date, BALI is up 11.92% versus a gain of 2.29% for NQLT.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BALI charges 0.35% per year while NQLT charges 0.48%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $48 annually, a gap of $13 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BALI currently yields 7.81% against 0.00% for NQLT.

Holdings Overlap

BALI already in NQLT42.0%
NQLT already in BALI59.7%

42.0% of BALI's money is in holdings NQLT also owns. 59.7% of NQLT's money is in holdings BALI also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

21 positions in common, counted across the 211 positions we hold weights for in BALI and 63 in NQLT, against full books of 206 and 63.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 38 positions for NQLT that do not appear in our book for BALI (33.8% of the fund), and 185 for BALI that do not appear in NQLT (56.5%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BALIWeight in NQLTDifference
NVDANvidia Corp7.35%6.09%1.26%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.39%7.64%2.25%
AAPLApple, Inc5.76%6.97%1.21%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc3.40%7.67%4.27%
GOOGAlphabet Inc. C2.32%5.40%3.08%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc2.53%3.68%1.15%
JPMJpmorgan Chase1.14%4.31%3.17%
BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity1.51%3.65%2.14%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.1.05%3.14%2.09%
COSTCostco Wholesale Corp.1.73%1.48%0.25%

59.7% of NQLT is already inside BALI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

BALINQLT

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BALI or NQLT?

BALI has an expense ratio of 0.35% while NQLT charges 0.48%. BALI is the cheaper option, by $13 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between BALI and NQLT?

59.7% of NQLT's money is in holdings BALI also owns. 59.7% of NQLT's is in holdings BALI also owns. They hold 21 positions in common, counted across the 211 positions we hold weights for in BALI and 63 in NQLT.

Which pays a higher dividend, BALI or NQLT?

BALI yields 7.81% while NQLT yields 0.00%, so BALI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is NQLT better than BALI?

BALI has a lower expense ratio. BALI is less concentrated, with 35.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.