BAMG vs IVV
Brookstone Growth Stock ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BAMG or IVV?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. BAMG led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BAMG | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $137M | $896.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 204 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +12.15% | +13.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | +18.27%Best | +17.54% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.10% | +22.46%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.9% | 12.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -21.0% | -18.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 3 years | $17,989 | $18,595Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 43.8% | 38.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Brookstone Asset Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 27, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 27, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3 years).
BAMG vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3 years both funds cover.
BAMG vs IVV Performance
Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG) is an ETF from Brookstone Asset Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BAMG returned +18.27% while IVV returned +17.54%. Year to date, BAMG is up 12.15% versus a gain of 13.59% for IVV.
Over three years, BAMG compounded at +21.10% per year against +22.46% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BAMG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.9% compared with 12.3% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.0% for BAMG and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BAMG charges 0.89% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $3 annually, a gap of $86 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAMG currently yields 0.01% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
94.2% of BAMG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 54.4% of IVV's money is in holdings BAMG also owns.
Most of BAMG is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
91 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in BAMG and 506 in IVV, against full books of 204 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 408 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for BAMG (45.0% of the fund), and 2 for BAMG that do not appear in IVV (0.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BAMG | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 5.11% | 8.44% | 3.33% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.15% | 7.29% | 2.14% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.14% | 5.76% | 0.62% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.82% | 3.68% | 1.14% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 5.07% | 3.00% | 2.07% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.68% | 2.47% | 2.21% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 3.64% | 1.52% | 2.12% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 3.71% | 1.39% | 2.32% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 3.74% | 1.34% | 2.40% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 2.69% | 0.93% | 1.76% |
94.2% of BAMG is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BAMG or IVV?
BAMG has an expense ratio of 0.89% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $86 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BAMG or IVV?
Over the past year BAMG returned +18.27% vs +17.54% for IVV, so BAMG leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BAMG or IVV?
BAMG has been the more volatile fund at 14.9% annualized versus 12.3% for IVV. Worst drawdown: BAMG -21.0% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both BAMG and IVV?
BAMG and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BAMG and IVV?
94.2% of BAMG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 54.4% of IVV's is in holdings BAMG also owns. They hold 91 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in BAMG and 506 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, BAMG or IVV?
BAMG yields 0.01% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than BAMG?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. BAMG led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.