BAMU vs QQQ
Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, BAMU or QQQ?
Ultrashort Term Bond against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BAMU | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.05% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $66M | $506.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.88% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 12 | 321 |
| YTD Return | +0.60% | +19.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | +1.30% | +22.47%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.01% | +26.18%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.42% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 0.7%Best | 17.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -0.7%Best | -22.8% |
| $10,000 over 3 years | $10,937 | $20,644Best |
| Top 10 Weight | - | 46.7% |
| Fund Family | Brookstone Asset Management | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Ultrashort Term Bond | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Sep 27, 2023 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 27, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3 years).
BAMU vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BAMU vs QQQ Performance
Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) is an ETF from Brookstone Asset Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BAMU returned +1.30% while QQQ returned +22.47%. Year to date, BAMU is up 0.60% versus a gain of 19.30% for QQQ.
Over three years, BAMU compounded at +3.01% per year against +26.18% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.1% compared with 0.7% for BAMU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -0.7% for BAMU and -22.8% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.17. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BAMU charges 1.05% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $105 vs $18 annually, a gap of $87 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAMU currently yields 2.88% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 5 holdings in BAMU and 101 in QQQ, totalling 99.2% and 99.6% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 5 positions we hold weights for in BAMU and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 12 and 321.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 93 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for BAMU (96.3% of the fund), and 4 for BAMU that do not appear in QQQ (79.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BAMU and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BAMU or QQQ?
BAMU has an expense ratio of 1.05% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $87 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BAMU or QQQ?
Over the past year BAMU returned +1.30% vs +22.47% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BAMU or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 17.1% annualized versus 0.7% for BAMU. Worst drawdown: BAMU -0.7% vs QQQ -22.8%.
Should I hold both BAMU and QQQ?
BAMU and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of -0.17, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BAMU or QQQ?
BAMU yields 2.88% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so BAMU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than BAMU?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.