BASG vs COWG
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF vs Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF
Which is better, BASG or COWG?
COWG has been ahead.
COWG has a lower expense ratio. COWG led over 1Y and the full window. COWG is less concentrated, with 32.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BASG | COWG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.61% | 0.49%Best |
| AUM | $527M | $2.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.75% |
| Holdings | 36 | 204 |
| YTD Return | +10.02% | +13.88%Best |
| 1Y Return | +8.00% | +13.28%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.86% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.4% | 13.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -19.3% | -10.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $11,181 | $11,546Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 48.9% | 32.7%Best |
| Fund Family | Brown Advisory | Pacer ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 13, 2025 | Dec 21, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 16, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.3 years).
BASG vs COWG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
BASG vs COWG Performance
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF (BASG) is an ETF from Brown Advisory and Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs. Over the past year BASG returned +8.00% while COWG returned +13.28%. Year to date, BASG is up 10.02% versus a gain of 13.88% for COWG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BASG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.4% compared with 13.5% for COWG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.3% for BASG and -10.8% for COWG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BASG charges 0.61% per year while COWG charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $61 vs $49 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BASG currently yields 0.00% against 0.75% for COWG.
Holdings Overlap
27.4% of BASG's money is in holdings COWG also owns. 12.4% of COWG's money is in holdings BASG also owns.
BASG and COWG share little of their money.
8 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in BASG and 100 in COWG, against full books of 36 and 204.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 90 positions for COWG that do not appear in our book for BASG (83.8% of the fund), and 22 for BASG that do not appear in COWG (60.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BASG | Weight in COWG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.77% | 0.94% | 7.83% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc | 1.63% | 3.60% | 1.97% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.32% | 0.74% | 3.58% |
| DDOGDatadog Inc | 1.59% | 3.46% | 1.87% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc. | 3.32% | 1.46% | 1.86% |
| CDNSCadence Design Systems Inc. | 2.83% | 0.84% | 1.99% |
| ABNBAirbnb Inc | 2.19% | 1.03% | 1.16% |
| ISRGIntuitive Surgical Inc. | 2.79% | 0.32% | 2.47% |
27.4% of BASG is already inside COWG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BASG or COWG?
BASG has an expense ratio of 0.61% while COWG charges 0.49%. COWG is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BASG or COWG?
Over the past year BASG returned +8.00% vs +13.28% for COWG, so COWG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BASG annualized +8.97% vs +11.69% for COWG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BASG or COWG?
BASG has been the more volatile fund at 14.4% annualized versus 13.5% for COWG. Worst drawdown: BASG -19.3% vs COWG -10.8%.
Should I hold both BASG and COWG?
BASG and COWG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BASG and COWG?
27.4% of BASG's money is in holdings COWG also owns. 12.4% of COWG's is in holdings BASG also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in BASG and 100 in COWG.
Which pays a higher dividend, BASG or COWG?
BASG yields 0.00% while COWG yields 0.75%, so COWG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is COWG better than BASG?
COWG has a lower expense ratio. COWG led over 1Y and the full window. COWG is less concentrated, with 32.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.