BASG vs FBCG
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF vs Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
Which is better, BASG or FBCG?
FBCG has been ahead.
FBCG has a lower expense ratio. FBCG led over 1Y and the full window. BASG is less concentrated, with 48.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BASG | FBCG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.61% | 0.57%Best |
| AUM | $527M | $7.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.03% |
| Holdings | 36 | 245 |
| YTD Return | +10.02% | +12.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | +8.00% | +17.09%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +27.54% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.04% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.4%Best | 18.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -19.3% | -15.2%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $11,181 | $13,308Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 48.9%Best | 57.5% |
| Fund Family | Brown Advisory | Fidelity Investments (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 13, 2025 | Jun 2, 2020 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 16, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.3 years).
BASG vs FBCG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
BASG vs FBCG Performance
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF (BASG) is an ETF from Brown Advisory and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US). Over the past year BASG returned +8.00% while FBCG returned +17.09%. Year to date, BASG is up 10.02% versus a gain of 12.59% for FBCG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FBCG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.6% compared with 14.4% for BASG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.3% for BASG and -15.2% for FBCG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BASG charges 0.61% per year while FBCG charges 0.57%. On a $10,000 position that is $61 vs $57 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BASG currently yields 0.00% against 0.03% for FBCG.
Holdings Overlap
66.5% of BASG's money is in holdings FBCG also owns. 36.6% of FBCG's money is in holdings BASG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
19 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in BASG and 200 in FBCG, against full books of 36 and 245.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 164 positions for FBCG that do not appear in our book for BASG (60.8% of the fund), and 13 for BASG that do not appear in FBCG (28.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BASG | Weight in FBCG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.77% | 15.68% | 6.91% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.99% | 5.56% | 0.43% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.83% | 4.97% | 0.86% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.32% | 4.11% | 0.21% |
| 2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 4.93% | 1.13% | 3.80% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 4.74% | 0.26% | 4.48% |
| MRVLMarvell Technology Inc | 3.83% | 1.06% | 2.77% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 4.04% | 0.26% | 3.78% |
| MPWRMonolithic Power Systems Inc | 3.12% | 0.82% | 2.30% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc. | 3.32% | 0.16% | 3.16% |
66.5% of BASG is already inside FBCG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BASG or FBCG?
BASG has an expense ratio of 0.61% while FBCG charges 0.57%. FBCG is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BASG or FBCG?
Over the past year BASG returned +8.00% vs +17.09% for FBCG, so FBCG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BASG annualized +8.97% vs +24.59% for FBCG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BASG or FBCG?
FBCG has been the more volatile fund at 18.6% annualized versus 14.4% for BASG. Worst drawdown: BASG -19.3% vs FBCG -15.2%.
Should I hold both BASG and FBCG?
BASG and FBCG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BASG and FBCG?
66.5% of BASG's money is in holdings FBCG also owns. 36.6% of FBCG's is in holdings BASG also owns. They hold 19 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in BASG and 200 in FBCG.
Which pays a higher dividend, BASG or FBCG?
BASG yields 0.00% while FBCG yields 0.03%, so FBCG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FBCG better than BASG?
FBCG has a lower expense ratio. FBCG led over 1Y and the full window. BASG is less concentrated, with 48.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.