BASG vs HQGO
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF vs Hartford US Quality Growth ETF
Which is better, BASG or HQGO?
HQGO has been ahead.
HQGO has a lower expense ratio. HQGO led over 1Y and the full window. HQGO is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BASG | HQGO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.61% | 0.34%Best |
| AUM | $527M | $3M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.51% |
| Holdings | 36 | 192 |
| YTD Return | +10.02% | +12.84%Best |
| 1Y Return | +8.00% | +15.94%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.4% | 11.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -19.3% | -10.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $11,181 | $12,736Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 48.9% | 38.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Brown Advisory | Hartford Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 13, 2025 | Dec 5, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 16, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.3 years).
BASG vs HQGO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
BASG vs HQGO Performance
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF (BASG) is an ETF from Brown Advisory and Hartford US Quality Growth ETF (HQGO) is an ETF from Hartford Funds. Over the past year BASG returned +8.00% while HQGO returned +15.94%. Year to date, BASG is up 10.02% versus a gain of 12.84% for HQGO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BASG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.4% compared with 11.8% for HQGO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.3% for BASG and -10.4% for HQGO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BASG charges 0.61% per year while HQGO charges 0.34%. On a $10,000 position that is $61 vs $34 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BASG currently yields 0.00% against 0.51% for HQGO.
Holdings Overlap
52.4% of BASG's money is in holdings HQGO also owns. 21.1% of HQGO's money is in holdings BASG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
14 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in BASG and 190 in HQGO, against full books of 36 and 192.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 174 positions for HQGO that do not appear in our book for BASG (78.7% of the fund), and 16 for BASG that do not appear in HQGO (35.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BASG | Weight in HQGO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.77% | 5.49% | 3.28% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.99% | 4.71% | 1.28% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.83% | 4.33% | 1.50% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.32% | 3.36% | 0.96% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 4.74% | 0.73% | 4.01% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc. | 3.32% | 0.18% | 3.14% |
| MPWRMonolithic Power Systems Inc | 3.12% | 0.18% | 2.94% |
| CDNSCadence Design Systems Inc. | 2.83% | 0.41% | 2.42% |
| CTASCintas Corp. | 2.76% | 0.47% | 2.29% |
| SNOWSnowflake Inc | 2.56% | 0.48% | 2.08% |
52.4% of BASG is already inside HQGO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BASG or HQGO?
BASG has an expense ratio of 0.61% while HQGO charges 0.34%. HQGO is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BASG or HQGO?
Over the past year BASG returned +8.00% vs +15.94% for HQGO, so HQGO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BASG annualized +8.97% vs +20.45% for HQGO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BASG or HQGO?
BASG has been the more volatile fund at 14.4% annualized versus 11.8% for HQGO. Worst drawdown: BASG -19.3% vs HQGO -10.4%.
Should I hold both BASG and HQGO?
BASG and HQGO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BASG and HQGO?
52.4% of BASG's money is in holdings HQGO also owns. 21.1% of HQGO's is in holdings BASG also owns. They hold 14 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in BASG and 190 in HQGO.
Which pays a higher dividend, BASG or HQGO?
BASG yields 0.00% while HQGO yields 0.51%, so HQGO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is HQGO better than BASG?
HQGO has a lower expense ratio. HQGO led over 1Y and the full window. HQGO is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.