BASG vs PCLC

BASG vs PCLC

Which is better, BASG or PCLC?

PCLC costs less.

PCLC has a lower expense ratio. BASG is less concentrated, with 48.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.1%.

Lower Fees: PCLCLess Concentrated: BASG

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBASGPCLC
Expense Ratio0.61%0.50%Best
AUM$527M$1M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings3639
YTD Return+10.02%Best+1.32%
1Y Return+8.00%-
Top 10 Weight48.9%Best52.1%
Fund FamilyBrown AdvisoryPolen Capital
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionJun 13, 2025May 18, 2026

Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

BASG vs PCLC growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare BASG against instead:BASG vs SPYBASG vs QQQBASG vs VOOBASG vs VTIPCLC against:PCLC vs VXUS

BASG vs PCLC Performance

Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF (BASG) is an ETF from Brown Advisory and Polen 5Perspectives Large Growth ETF (PCLC) is an ETF from Polen Capital. Year to date, BASG is up 10.02% versus a gain of 1.32% for PCLC.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BASG charges 0.61% per year while PCLC charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $61 vs $50 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BASG currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for PCLC.

Holdings Overlap

BASG already in PCLC43.5%
PCLC already in BASG38.1%

43.5% of BASG's money is in holdings PCLC also owns. 38.1% of PCLC's money is in holdings BASG also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

11 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in BASG and 39 in PCLC, against full books of 36 and 39.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 23 positions for PCLC that do not appear in our book for BASG (54.2% of the fund), and 21 for BASG that do not appear in PCLC (51.4%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BASGWeight in PCLCDifference
NVDANvidia Corp8.77%10.62%1.85%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc5.83%4.61%1.22%
2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd4.93%4.01%0.92%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.99%2.58%3.41%
AVGOBroadcom Inc4.32%3.64%0.68%
SPCXSpace Exploration Technologies1.31%4.37%3.06%
ANETArista Networks Inc.3.32%2.20%1.12%
SNOWSnowflake Inc2.56%2.30%0.26%
SHOP:CAShopify Inc - Common2.34%1.70%0.64%
ABNBAirbnb Inc2.19%1.03%1.16%

43.5% of BASG is already inside PCLC.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

BASGPCLC

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BASG or PCLC?

BASG has an expense ratio of 0.61% while PCLC charges 0.50%. PCLC is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between BASG and PCLC?

43.5% of BASG's money is in holdings PCLC also owns. 38.1% of PCLC's is in holdings BASG also owns. They hold 11 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in BASG and 39 in PCLC.

Which pays a higher dividend, BASG or PCLC?

BASG yields 0.00% while PCLC yields 0.00%, so PCLC currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is PCLC better than BASG?

PCLC has a lower expense ratio. BASG is less concentrated, with 48.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.