BASG vs TFGZ
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF vs Thornburg Focus Growth Fund ETF
Which is better, BASG or TFGZ?
TFGZ has been ahead.
BASG has a lower expense ratio. TFGZ led over 1Y. BASG is less concentrated, with 48.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BASG | TFGZ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.61%Best | 0.79% |
| AUM | $527M | $12M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 36 | 43 |
| YTD Return | +10.02% | +16.33%Best |
| 1Y Return | +8.00% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 48.9%Best | 49.4% |
| Fund Family | Brown Advisory | Thornburg Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 13, 2025 | Apr 1, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
BASG vs TFGZ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BASG vs TFGZ Performance
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF (BASG) is an ETF from Brown Advisory and Thornburg Focus Growth Fund ETF (TFGZ) is an ETF from Thornburg Investment Management. Year to date, BASG is up 10.02% versus a gain of 16.33% for TFGZ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BASG charges 0.61% per year while TFGZ charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $61 vs $79 annually, a gap of $18 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BASG currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for TFGZ.
Holdings Overlap
20.5% of BASG's money is in holdings TFGZ also owns. 20.0% of TFGZ's money is in holdings BASG also owns.
BASG and TFGZ share little of their money.
6 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in BASG and 42 in TFGZ, against full books of 36 and 43.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 29 positions for TFGZ that do not appear in our book for BASG (66.4% of the fund), and 25 for BASG that do not appear in TFGZ (69.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
20.5% of BASG is already inside TFGZ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BASG or TFGZ?
BASG has an expense ratio of 0.61% while TFGZ charges 0.79%. BASG is the cheaper option, by $18 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between BASG and TFGZ?
20.5% of BASG's money is in holdings TFGZ also owns. 20.0% of TFGZ's is in holdings BASG also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in BASG and 42 in TFGZ.
Which pays a higher dividend, BASG or TFGZ?
BASG yields 0.00% while TFGZ yields 0.00%, so TFGZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TFGZ better than BASG?
BASG has a lower expense ratio. TFGZ led over 1Y. BASG is less concentrated, with 48.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.