BASG vs WINN
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF vs Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF
Which is better, BASG or WINN?
WINN has been ahead.
WINN has a lower expense ratio. WINN led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. BASG is less concentrated, with 48.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BASG | WINN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.61% | 0.57%Best |
| AUM | $527M | $1.3B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 36 | 146 |
| YTD Return | +10.02% | +11.03%Best |
| 1Y Return | +8.00% | +11.42%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.98% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.4%Best | 16.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -19.3% | -18.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $11,181 | $12,222Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 48.9%Best | 57.5% |
| Fund Family | Brown Advisory | Harbor Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 13, 2025 | Feb 2, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 16, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.3 years).
BASG vs WINN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
BASG vs WINN Performance
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF (BASG) is an ETF from Brown Advisory and Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) is an ETF from Harbor Funds. Over the past year BASG returned +8.00% while WINN returned +11.42%. Year to date, BASG is up 10.02% versus a gain of 11.03% for WINN.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WINN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.4% compared with 14.4% for BASG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.3% for BASG and -18.1% for WINN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BASG charges 0.61% per year while WINN charges 0.57%. On a $10,000 position that is $61 vs $57 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BASG currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for WINN.
Holdings Overlap
61.8% of BASG's money is in holdings WINN also owns. 40.5% of WINN's money is in holdings BASG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
18 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in BASG and 74 in WINN, against full books of 36 and 146.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 53 positions for WINN that do not appear in our book for BASG (58.6% of the fund), and 14 for BASG that do not appear in WINN (33.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BASG | Weight in WINN | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.77% | 11.75% | 2.98% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.99% | 6.21% | 0.22% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.83% | 4.82% | 1.01% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.32% | 5.40% | 1.08% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 4.74% | 0.92% | 3.82% |
| 2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 4.93% | 0.57% | 4.36% |
| SNOWSnowflake Inc | 2.56% | 1.92% | 0.64% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc. | 3.32% | 1.07% | 2.25% |
| CDNSCadence Design Systems Inc. | 2.83% | 1.15% | 1.68% |
| DHRDanaher Corporation | 2.69% | 0.83% | 1.86% |
61.8% of BASG is already inside WINN.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BASG or WINN?
BASG has an expense ratio of 0.61% while WINN charges 0.57%. WINN is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BASG or WINN?
Over the past year BASG returned +8.00% vs +11.42% for WINN, so WINN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BASG annualized +8.97% vs +16.69% for WINN. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BASG or WINN?
WINN has been the more volatile fund at 16.4% annualized versus 14.4% for BASG. Worst drawdown: BASG -19.3% vs WINN -18.1%.
Should I hold both BASG and WINN?
BASG and WINN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BASG and WINN?
61.8% of BASG's money is in holdings WINN also owns. 40.5% of WINN's is in holdings BASG also owns. They hold 18 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in BASG and 74 in WINN.
Which pays a higher dividend, BASG or WINN?
BASG yields 0.00% while WINN yields 0.00%, so WINN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WINN better than BASG?
WINN has a lower expense ratio. WINN led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. BASG is less concentrated, with 48.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.