BASV vs BKDV
Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF vs BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF
Which is better, BASV or BKDV?
BKDV has been ahead.
BKDV has a lower expense ratio. BKDV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. BKDV is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BASV | BKDV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.71% | 0.60%Best |
| AUM | $413M | $2.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.38% | 0.53% |
| Holdings | 42 | 84 |
| YTD Return | +7.52% | +17.11%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.61% | +23.83%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.7% | 9.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -9.4% | -6.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $11,949 | $13,191Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 34.7% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Brown Advisory | BNY Mellon Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jun 13, 2025 | Nov 1, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 16, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.3 years).
BASV vs BKDV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
BASV vs BKDV Performance
Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF (BASV) is an ETF from Brown Advisory and BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF (BKDV) is an ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management. Over the past year BASV returned +11.61% while BKDV returned +23.83%. Year to date, BASV is up 7.52% versus a gain of 17.11% for BKDV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BASV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 10.7% compared with 9.2% for BKDV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.4% for BASV and -6.7% for BKDV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BASV charges 0.71% per year while BKDV charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $71 vs $60 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BASV currently yields 0.38% against 0.53% for BKDV.
Holdings Overlap
32.5% of BASV's money is in holdings BKDV also owns. 24.2% of BKDV's money is in holdings BASV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
13 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in BASV and 79 in BKDV, against full books of 42 and 84.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 65 positions for BKDV that do not appear in our book for BASV (75.0% of the fund), and 24 for BASV that do not appear in BKDV (53.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BASV | Weight in BKDV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.27% | 6.02% | 1.75% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.68% | 4.98% | 1.30% |
| SLBSchlumberger Nv. | 2.26% | 2.62% | 0.36% |
| ELVElevance Health Inc | 2.48% | 1.81% | 0.67% |
| CCitigroup Inc. | 2.99% | 1.06% | 1.93% |
| CEGConstellation Energy Corporation Com | 2.84% | 1.00% | 1.84% |
| CRH:LNCrh Plc - Common | 2.67% | 1.06% | 1.61% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 2.90% | 0.78% | 2.12% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.10% | 2.21% | 1.11% |
| AIGAmerican International Gr | 2.77% | 0.46% | 2.31% |
32.5% of BASV is already inside BKDV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BASV or BKDV?
BASV has an expense ratio of 0.71% while BKDV charges 0.60%. BKDV is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BASV or BKDV?
Over the past year BASV returned +11.61% vs +23.83% for BKDV, so BKDV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BASV annualized +14.68% vs +23.74% for BKDV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BASV or BKDV?
BASV has been the more volatile fund at 10.7% annualized versus 9.2% for BKDV. Worst drawdown: BASV -9.4% vs BKDV -6.7%.
Should I hold both BASV and BKDV?
BASV and BKDV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BASV and BKDV?
32.5% of BASV's money is in holdings BKDV also owns. 24.2% of BKDV's is in holdings BASV also owns. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in BASV and 79 in BKDV.
Which pays a higher dividend, BASV or BKDV?
BASV yields 0.38% while BKDV yields 0.53%, so BKDV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is BKDV better than BASV?
BKDV has a lower expense ratio. BKDV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. BKDV is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.