BASV vs FBCV
Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF vs Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF
Which is better, BASV or FBCV?
FBCV has been ahead.
FBCV has a lower expense ratio. FBCV led over 1Y and the full window. FBCV is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BASV | FBCV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.71% | 0.57%Best |
| AUM | $413M | $184M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.38% | 1.25% |
| Holdings | 42 | 127 |
| YTD Return | +7.52% | +18.42%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.61% | +24.20%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +16.61% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.11% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.7%Tie | 10.7%Tie |
| Max Drawdown | -9.4% | -7.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $11,949 | $13,088Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 34.7% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Brown Advisory | Fidelity Investments (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jun 13, 2025 | Jun 2, 2020 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 16, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.3 years).
BASV vs FBCV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
BASV vs FBCV Performance
Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF (BASV) is an ETF from Brown Advisory and Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF (FBCV) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US). Over the past year BASV returned +11.61% while FBCV returned +24.20%. Year to date, BASV is up 7.52% versus a gain of 18.42% for FBCV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BASV and FBCV have been equally volatile, both at 10.7% annualized.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.4% for BASV and -7.4% for FBCV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BASV charges 0.71% per year while FBCV charges 0.57%. On a $10,000 position that is $71 vs $57 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BASV currently yields 0.38% against 1.25% for FBCV.
Holdings Overlap
40.4% of BASV's money is in holdings FBCV also owns. 23.2% of FBCV's money is in holdings BASV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 62 days apart, BASV as of Oct 1, 2026 and FBCV as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
17 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in BASV and 133 in FBCV, against full books of 42 and 127.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 94 positions for FBCV that do not appear in our book for BASV (68.5% of the fund), and 22 for BASV that do not appear in FBCV (51.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BASV | Weight in FBCV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.27% | 7.46% | 3.19% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.68% | 5.24% | 1.56% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 2.90% | 2.64% | 0.26% |
| WTW:LNWillis Towers Watson Plc Ordinary Shares | 3.09% | 0.57% | 2.52% |
| SCHWSchwab Strategic T | 2.41% | 1.23% | 1.18% |
| UL:LNUnilever PLC | 2.83% | 0.50% | 2.33% |
| PNRPentair Plc Ordinary Shares | 2.95% | 0.32% | 2.63% |
| ELVElevance Health Inc | 2.48% | 0.68% | 1.80% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 1.35% | 1.53% | 0.18% |
| CRH:LNCrh Plc - Common | 2.67% | 0.00% | 2.67% |
40.4% of BASV is already inside FBCV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BASV or FBCV?
BASV has an expense ratio of 0.71% while FBCV charges 0.57%. FBCV is the cheaper option, by $14 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BASV or FBCV?
Over the past year BASV returned +11.61% vs +24.20% for FBCV, so FBCV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BASV annualized +14.68% vs +23.00% for FBCV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BASV or FBCV?
BASV and FBCV have been equally volatile, both at 10.7% annualized. Worst drawdown: BASV -9.4% vs FBCV -7.4%.
Should I hold both BASV and FBCV?
BASV and FBCV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BASV and FBCV?
40.4% of BASV's money is in holdings FBCV also owns. 23.2% of FBCV's is in holdings BASV also owns. They hold 17 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in BASV and 133 in FBCV.
Which pays a higher dividend, BASV or FBCV?
BASV yields 0.38% while FBCV yields 1.25%, so FBCV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FBCV better than BASV?
FBCV has a lower expense ratio. FBCV led over 1Y and the full window. FBCV is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.