BASV vs FLCV
Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF vs Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF
Which is better, BASV or FLCV?
FLCV has been ahead.
FLCV has a lower expense ratio. FLCV led over 1Y and the full window. FLCV is less concentrated, with 31.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BASV | FLCV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.71% | 0.32%Best |
| AUM | $413M | $211M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.38% | 0.72% |
| Holdings | 42 | 252 |
| YTD Return | +7.52% | +18.52%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.61% | +23.69%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.7% | 10.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -9.4% | -5.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $11,949 | $12,888Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 34.7% | 31.0%Best |
| Fund Family | Brown Advisory | Federated Hermes |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jun 13, 2025 | Jul 30, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 16, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.3 years).
BASV vs FLCV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
BASV vs FLCV Performance
Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF (BASV) is an ETF from Brown Advisory and Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value ETF (FLCV) is an ETF from Federated Hermes. Over the past year BASV returned +11.61% while FLCV returned +23.69%. Year to date, BASV is up 7.52% versus a gain of 18.52% for FLCV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BASV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 10.7% compared with 10.0% for FLCV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.4% for BASV and -5.7% for FLCV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BASV charges 0.71% per year while FLCV charges 0.32%. On a $10,000 position that is $71 vs $32 annually, a gap of $39 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BASV currently yields 0.38% against 0.72% for FLCV.
Holdings Overlap
25.9% of BASV's money is in holdings FLCV also owns. 16.5% of FLCV's money is in holdings BASV also owns.
BASV and FLCV share little of their money.
10 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in BASV and 126 in FLCV, against full books of 42 and 252.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 116 positions for FLCV that do not appear in our book for BASV (83.6% of the fund), and 26 for BASV that do not appear in FLCV (57.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BASV | Weight in FLCV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.27% | 5.80% | 1.53% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.68% | 4.38% | 0.70% |
| CAHCardinal Health Inc. | 3.86% | 0.59% | 3.27% |
| TMUST-Mobile Usa Inc Esrw Usd Npv Ref Sm#585558 | 2.83% | 0.32% | 2.51% |
| SCHWSchwab Strategic T | 2.41% | 0.72% | 1.69% |
| TTTt Trane Technologies Plc | 1.97% | 0.81% | 1.16% |
| CBRECbre Services Inc | 2.55% | 0.20% | 2.35% |
| SNXSynnex Corp | 1.88% | 0.82% | 1.06% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.10% | 1.58% | 0.48% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 1.35% | 1.25% | 0.10% |
25.9% of BASV is already inside FLCV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BASV or FLCV?
BASV has an expense ratio of 0.71% while FLCV charges 0.32%. FLCV is the cheaper option, by $39 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BASV or FLCV?
Over the past year BASV returned +11.61% vs +23.69% for FLCV, so FLCV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BASV annualized +14.68% vs +21.55% for FLCV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BASV or FLCV?
BASV has been the more volatile fund at 10.7% annualized versus 10.0% for FLCV. Worst drawdown: BASV -9.4% vs FLCV -5.7%.
Should I hold both BASV and FLCV?
BASV and FLCV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BASV and FLCV?
25.9% of BASV's money is in holdings FLCV also owns. 16.5% of FLCV's is in holdings BASV also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in BASV and 126 in FLCV.
Which pays a higher dividend, BASV or FLCV?
BASV yields 0.38% while FLCV yields 0.72%, so FLCV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FLCV better than BASV?
FLCV has a lower expense ratio. FLCV led over 1Y and the full window. FLCV is less concentrated, with 31.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.