BASV vs FLV
Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF vs American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF
Which is better, BASV or FLV?
FLV has been ahead.
FLV has a lower expense ratio. FLV led over 1Y and the full window. FLV is less concentrated, with 32.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BASV | FLV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.71% | 0.42%Best |
| AUM | $413M | $379M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.38% | 1.73% |
| Holdings | 42 | 56 |
| YTD Return | +7.52% | +12.50%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.61% | +16.84%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +16.33% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.83% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.7%Best | 12.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -9.4% | -7.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $11,949 | $12,542Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 34.7% | 32.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Brown Advisory | American Century ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jun 13, 2025 | Mar 31, 2020 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 16, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.3 years).
BASV vs FLV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
BASV vs FLV Performance
Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF (BASV) is an ETF from Brown Advisory and American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF (FLV) is an ETF from American Century ETFs. Over the past year BASV returned +11.61% while FLV returned +16.84%. Year to date, BASV is up 7.52% versus a gain of 12.50% for FLV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.0% compared with 10.7% for BASV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.4% for BASV and -7.5% for FLV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BASV charges 0.71% per year while FLV charges 0.42%. On a $10,000 position that is $71 vs $42 annually, a gap of $29 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BASV currently yields 0.38% against 1.73% for FLV.
Holdings Overlap
26.6% of BASV's money is in holdings FLV also owns. 20.9% of FLV's money is in holdings BASV also owns.
BASV and FLV share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 93 days apart, BASV as of Oct 1, 2026 and FLV as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
11 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in BASV and 52 in FLV, against full books of 42 and 56.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 38 positions for FLV that do not appear in our book for BASV (74.6% of the fund), and 26 for BASV that do not appear in FLV (59.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BASV | Weight in FLV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.27% | 3.07% | 1.20% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.68% | 3.46% | 0.22% |
| BDXBecton Dickinson And Co. | 3.47% | 3.20% | 0.27% |
| UL:LNUnilever PLC | 2.83% | 2.32% | 0.51% |
| SCHWSchwab Strategic T | 2.41% | 2.07% | 0.34% |
| HONAHoneywell Aerospace Inc | 2.48% | 1.01% | 1.47% |
| MDLZMondelez International Inc Com A Npv | 1.79% | 1.48% | 0.31% |
| SNYSano Llc | 1.51% | 1.49% | 0.02% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.10% | 1.82% | 0.72% |
| NXPINxp Semiconductors Nv Sedol B505Pn7 | 2.10% | 0.00% | 2.10% |
26.6% of BASV is already inside FLV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BASV or FLV?
BASV has an expense ratio of 0.71% while FLV charges 0.42%. FLV is the cheaper option, by $29 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BASV or FLV?
Over the past year BASV returned +11.61% vs +16.84% for FLV, so FLV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BASV annualized +14.68% vs +19.03% for FLV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BASV or FLV?
FLV has been the more volatile fund at 12.0% annualized versus 10.7% for BASV. Worst drawdown: BASV -9.4% vs FLV -7.5%.
Should I hold both BASV and FLV?
BASV and FLV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BASV and FLV?
26.6% of BASV's money is in holdings FLV also owns. 20.9% of FLV's is in holdings BASV also owns. They hold 11 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in BASV and 52 in FLV.
Which pays a higher dividend, BASV or FLV?
BASV yields 0.38% while FLV yields 1.73%, so FLV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FLV better than BASV?
FLV has a lower expense ratio. FLV led over 1Y and the full window. FLV is less concentrated, with 32.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.