BASV vs JAVA
Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF vs JPMorgan Active Value ETF
Which is better, BASV or JAVA?
JAVA has been ahead.
JAVA has a lower expense ratio. JAVA led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. JAVA is less concentrated, with 29.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BASV | JAVA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.71% | 0.44%Best |
| AUM | $413M | $7.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.38% | 1.19% |
| Holdings | 42 | 153 |
| YTD Return | +7.52% | +13.15%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.61% | +20.54%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.31% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.63% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.7% | 9.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -9.4% | -8.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $11,949 | $12,863Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 34.7% | 29.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Brown Advisory | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jun 13, 2025 | Oct 4, 2021 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 16, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.3 years).
BASV vs JAVA growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
BASV vs JAVA Performance
Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF (BASV) is an ETF from Brown Advisory and JPMorgan Active Value ETF (JAVA) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Over the past year BASV returned +11.61% while JAVA returned +20.54%. Year to date, BASV is up 7.52% versus a gain of 13.15% for JAVA.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BASV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 10.7% compared with 9.5% for JAVA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.4% for BASV and -8.3% for JAVA. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BASV charges 0.71% per year while JAVA charges 0.44%. On a $10,000 position that is $71 vs $44 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BASV currently yields 0.38% against 1.19% for JAVA.
Holdings Overlap
36.3% of BASV's money is in holdings JAVA also owns. 23.0% of JAVA's money is in holdings BASV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
14 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in BASV and 151 in JAVA, against full books of 42 and 153.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 136 positions for JAVA that do not appear in our book for BASV (76.7% of the fund), and 22 for BASV that do not appear in JAVA (46.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BASV | Weight in JAVA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.27% | 7.63% | 3.36% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.68% | 6.29% | 2.61% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 2.90% | 2.19% | 0.71% |
| CCitigroup Inc. | 2.99% | 1.39% | 1.60% |
| CAHCardinal Health Inc. | 3.86% | 0.26% | 3.60% |
| SCHWSchwab Strategic T | 2.41% | 1.65% | 0.76% |
| BDXBecton Dickinson And Co. | 3.47% | 0.32% | 3.15% |
| NXPINxp Semiconductors Nv Sedol B505Pn7 | 2.10% | 0.96% | 1.14% |
| ELVElevance Health Inc | 2.48% | 0.51% | 1.97% |
| SNXSynnex Corp | 1.88% | 0.58% | 1.30% |
36.3% of BASV is already inside JAVA.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BASV or JAVA?
BASV has an expense ratio of 0.71% while JAVA charges 0.44%. JAVA is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BASV or JAVA?
Over the past year BASV returned +11.61% vs +20.54% for JAVA, so JAVA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BASV annualized +14.68% vs +21.37% for JAVA. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BASV or JAVA?
BASV has been the more volatile fund at 10.7% annualized versus 9.5% for JAVA. Worst drawdown: BASV -9.4% vs JAVA -8.3%.
Should I hold both BASV and JAVA?
BASV and JAVA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BASV and JAVA?
36.3% of BASV's money is in holdings JAVA also owns. 23.0% of JAVA's is in holdings BASV also owns. They hold 14 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in BASV and 151 in JAVA.
Which pays a higher dividend, BASV or JAVA?
BASV yields 0.38% while JAVA yields 1.19%, so JAVA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is JAVA better than BASV?
JAVA has a lower expense ratio. JAVA led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. JAVA is less concentrated, with 29.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.